Angelica Spina

dblp:374/5530 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-6904-6184ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
Roberto Milanese, Francesco Salzano, Angelica Spina, Antonio Vitale, Remo Pareschi, Fausto Fasano, Mattia Fazzini
MSR3
2026 Using large language models to test voice user interfaces
abstract
Abstract Voice-based virtual assistants enable hands-free operation, allowing users to perform tasks, access information, and control smart home devices through simple voice commands. Their growing ubiquity in smartphones, smart speakers, and other devices led to the flourish of more and more apps taking advantage of a Voice User Interface (VUI). VUI testing is far from trivial due to the wide variability in human speech (e.g., different accents, dialects, speech patterns), and the fact that users can express the same command in numerous ways, using different (but semantically equivalent) wordings and phrases. For this reason, techniques have been proposed to support VUI testing. The basic idea behind these specialized approaches is to generate paraphrases for the set of voice commands for which developers implemented support in the VUI. Preliminary results from a recent study suggest that specialized models can outperform a general-purpose LLM (ChatGPT). However, a simple prompt and interaction strategy with ChatGPT has been adopted. In other words, it is still unknown whether optimizing the LLM usage allows to obtain better results. In this paper, we aim to thoroughly study to what extent LLMs (ChatGPT, specifically) can be adopted to test VUIs. We focused on optimizing the used prompt and the interaction with the model. Our results show that an optimized use of LLMs results in new state-of-the-art performance for VUI testing in terms of number of correct and bug-revealing paraphrases. While introducing the generated paraphrases into the Voice Interaction Models of the skills allows to fix some bugs, we observe that many bugs remain, and some are even introduced by the generated paraphrases. Our results call for specialized approaches for fixing bugs in VUIs.
Emanuela Guglielmi, Angelica Spina, Gabriele Bavota, Rocco Oliveto, Simone Scalabrino
Empir. Softw. Eng.2
2026 Peeking inside the black box: Training data exposure in code language models
Angelica Spina, Marco Russodivito, Simone Scalabrino, Rocco Oliveto
J. Syst. Softw.1
2024 Continuous Quality Improvement of AI-based Systems: the QualAI Project
abstract
QualAI is a two-year project aimed at defining a set of recommenders to continuously monitor, assess, and improve the quality of AI-based systems, with a particular focus on machine learning (ML) applications. We will develop recommenders for the quality assurance of both data and ML models to enable practitioners to mitigate technical debt. Special attention will be paid to communication challenges that may arise in hybrid teams comprising data scientists and software developers. This paper presents the project outline, provides an executive summary of the research activities, outlines the expected project outcomes, and reports the results obtained to date.
Nicole Novielli, Rocco Oliveto, Fabio Palomba, Fabio Calefato, Giuseppe Colavito, Vincenzo De Martino, Antonio Della Porta, Giammaria Giordano, Emanuela Guglielmi, Filippo Lanubile, Luigi Quaranta, Gilberto Recupito, Simone Scalabrino, Angelica Spina, Antonio Vitale
ESEM14