Mateusz Rapicki

dblp:374/9455 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 70% Language models and text generation · 23% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
faithfulness evaluation
0.912025
Accurate Estimation of Feature Importance Faithfulness for Tree Models · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution
0.912025
Accurate Estimation of Feature Importance Faithfulness for Tree Models · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance
0.912025
Accurate Estimation of Feature Importance Faithfulness for Tree Models · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Accurate Estimation of Feature Importance Faithfulness for Tree Models · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree models
0.312025
Accurate Estimation of Feature Importance Faithfulness for Tree Models · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

perturbation-based metric · 0.9SHAP · 0.9PGI squared · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Accurate Estimation of Feature Importance Faithfulness for Tree Models
abstract
In this paper, we consider a perturbation-based metric of predictive faithfulness of feature rankings (or attributions) that we call PGI squared When applied to decision tree-based regression models, the metric can be computed exactly and efficiently for arbitrary independent feature perturbation distributions. In particular, the computation does not involve Monte Carlo sampling that has been typically used for computing similar metrics and which is inherently prone to inaccuracies. As a second contribution, we proposed a procedure for constructing feature ranking based on PGI squared. Our results indicate the proposed ranking method is comparable to the widely recognized SHAP explainer, offering a viable alternative for assessing feature importance in tree-based models.
Mateusz Gajewski, Adam Karczmarz, Mateusz Rapicki, Piotr Sankowski
AAAI3