Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chengyan Fu

dblp:375/1151 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 91% Vision and language · 9%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.912025
Auto-Search and Refinement: An Automated Framework for Gender Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias mitigation
gender bias mitigation
0.912025
Auto-Search and Refinement: An Automated Framework for Gender Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias mitigation
large language model debiasing
0.912025
Auto-Search and Refinement: An Automated Framework for Gender Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
jailbreak attack
0.912025
MMJ-Bench: A Comprehensive Study on Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses for Vision Language Models · AAAI 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › large language model safety
jailbreak defense
0.912025
MMJ-Bench: A Comprehensive Study on Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses for Vision Language Models · AAAI 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.312025
MMJ-Bench: A Comprehensive Study on Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses for Vision Language Models · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

benchmark evaluation · 1.7sequence-to-sequence model · 0.9auto-search · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 MMJ-Bench: A Comprehensive Study on Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses for Vision Language Models
abstract
As deep learning advances, Large Language Models (LLMs) and their multimodal counterparts, Vision-Language Models (VLMs), have shown exceptional performance in many real-world tasks. However, VLMs face significant security challenges, such as jailbreak attacks, where attackers attempt to bypass the model’s safety alignment to elicit harmful responses. The threat of jailbreak attacks on VLMs arises from both the inherent vulnerabilities of LLMs and the multiple information channels that VLMs process. While various attacks and defenses have been proposed, there is a notable gap in unified and comprehensive evaluations, as each method is evaluated on different dataset and metrics, making it impossible to compare the effectiveness of each method. To address this gap, we introduce MMJ-Bench, a unified pipeline for evaluating jailbreak attacks and defense techniques for VLMs. Through extensive experiments, we assess the effectiveness of various attack methods against SoTA VLMs and evaluate the impact of defense mechanisms on both defense effectiveness and model utility for normal tasks. Our comprehensive evaluation contribute to the field by offering a unified and systematic evaluation framework and the first public-available benchmark for VLM jailbreak research. We also demonstrate several insightful findings that highlights directions for future studies.
Fenghua Weng, Chengyan Fu
AAAI3
2025 Auto-Search and Refinement: An Automated Framework for Gender Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models
abstract
Pre-training large language models (LLMs) on vast text corpora enhances natural language processing capabilities but risks encoding social biases, particularly gender bias. While parameter-modification methods like fine-tuning mitigate bias, they are resource-intensive, unsuitable for closed-source models, and lack adaptability to evolving societal norms. Instruction-based approaches offer flexibility but often compromise general performance on normal tasks. To address these limitations, we propose $\textit{FaIRMaker}$, an automated and model-independent framework that employs an $\textbf{auto-search and refinement}$ paradigm to adaptively generate Fairwords, which act as instructions to reduce gender bias and enhance response quality. $\textit{FaIRMaker}$ enhances the debiasing capacity by enlarging the Fairwords search space while preserving the utility and making it applicable to closed-source models by training a sequence-to-sequence model that adaptively refines Fairwords into effective debiasing instructions when facing gender-related queries and performance-boosting prompts for neutral inputs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that $\textit{FaIRMaker}$ effectively mitigates gender bias while preserving task integrity and ensuring compatibility with both open- and closed-source LLMs.
Chengyan Fu, Li Xiong 0001, Sibei Yang, Wenjie Wang 0008
NeurIPS2