VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Celia Rubio-Madrigal
dblp:375/1324
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8061-8334ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | GNNs Getting ComFy: Community and Feature Similarity Guided Rewiring · ICLR 2025 Spectral Graph Pruning Against Over-Squashing and Over-Smoothing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph rewiring |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GNNs Getting ComFy: Community and Feature Similarity Guided Rewiring · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-squashing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GNNs Getting ComFy: Community and Feature Similarity Guided Rewiring · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph pruning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Spectral Graph Pruning Against Over-Squashing and Over-Smoothing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Spectral Graph Pruning Against Over-Squashing and Over-Smoothing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing and over-squashing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Spectral Graph Pruning Against Over-Squashing and Over-Smoothing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic block model · 0.9spectral gap optimization · 0.9spectral gap maximization · 0.8edge deletion · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | GNNs Getting ComFy: Community and Feature Similarity Guided RewiringabstractMaximizing the spectral gap through graph rewiring has been proposed to enhance the performance of message-passing graph neural networks (GNNs) by addressing over-squashing. However, as we show, minimizing the spectral gap can also improve generalization. To explain this, we analyze how rewiring can benefit GNNs within the context of stochastic block models. Since spectral gap optimization primarily influences community strength, it improves performance when the community structure aligns with node labels. Building on this insight, we propose three distinct rewiring strategies that explicitly target community structure, node labels, and their alignment: (a) community structure-based rewiring (ComMa), a more computationally efficient alternative to spectral gap optimization that achieves similar goals; (b) feature similarity-based rewiring (FeaSt), which focuses on maximizing global homophily; and (c) a hybrid approach (ComFy), which enhances local feature similarity while preserving community structure to optimize label-community alignment. Extensive experiments confirm the effectiveness of these strategies and support our theoretical insights. Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Adarsh Jamadandi, Rebekka Burkholz |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Spectral Graph Pruning Against Over-Squashing and Over-SmoothingabstractMessage Passing Graph Neural Networks are known to suffer from two problems that are sometimes believed to be diametrically opposed: over-squashing and over-smoothing. The former results from topological bottlenecks that hamper the information flow from distant nodes and are mitigated by spectral gap maximization, primarily, by means of edge additions. However, such additions often promote over-smoothing that renders nodes of different classes less distinguishable. Inspired by the Braess phenomenon, we argue that deleting edges can address over-squashing and over-smoothing simultaneously. This insight explains how edge deletions can improve generalization, thus connecting spectral gap optimization to a seemingly disconnected objective of reducing computational resources by pruning graphs for lottery tickets. To this end, we propose a computationally effective spectral gap optimization framework to add or delete edges and demonstrate its effectiveness on the long range graph benchmark and on larger heterophilous datasets. Adarsh Jamadandi, Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka Burkholz |
NeurIPS | 2 |