Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lena Krieger 0001

dblp:375/3911-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-1894-7539ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 82% Recommender systems · 18%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Generative modeling · 33%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
anomaly detection
1.012026
DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers · KDD (1) 2026
Recommender systems › explainable recommendation
counterfactual explanation
1.012026
DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers · KDD (1) 2026
Data mining › anomaly detection
outlier explanation
1.012026
DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers · KDD (1) 2026
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
conditional flow matching
0.912025
LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation
0.912025
LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fair unsupervised learning
fair clustering
0.912025
FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.912025
FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Data mining
clustering
0.912025
FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering · ICLR 2025
Data mining › clustering
density-based clustering
0.912025
FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering · ICLR 2025
Data mining › clustering › constrained clustering
fair clustering
0.912025
FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient-based optimization · 1.0counterfactual generation · 1.0conditional flow matching · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers
abstract
Outlier detection identifies data points that significantly deviate from the majority of the data distribution. Explaining outliers is crucial for understanding the underlying factors that contribute to their detection, validating their significance, and identifying potential biases or errors. Effective explanations provide actionable insights, facilitating preventive measures to avoid similar outliers in the future. Counterfactual explanations clarify why specific data points are classified as outliers by identifying minimal changes required to alter their prediction. Although valuable, most existing counterfactual explanation methods overlook the unique challenges posed by outlier detection, and fail to target classical, widely adopted outlier detection algorithms. Local Outlier Factor (LOF) is one of the most popular unsupervised outlier detection methods, quantifying outlierness through relative local density. Despite LOF's widespread use across diverse applications, it lacks interpretability. To address this limitation, we introduce Density-based Counterfactuals for Outliers (DCFO), a novel method specifically designed to generate counterfactual explanations for LOF. DCFO partitions the data space into regions where LOF behaves smoothly, enabling efficient gradient-based optimisation. Extensive experimental validation on 50 OpenML datasets demonstrates that DCFO consistently outperforms benchmarked competitors, offering superior proximity and validity of generated counterfactuals.
Tommaso Amico, Pernille Matthews, Lena Krieger 0001, Arthur Zimek, Ira Assent
KDD (1)3
2025 FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering
abstract
Fairness in data mining tasks like clustering has recently become an increasingly important aspect. However, few clustering algorithms exist that focus on fair groupings of data with sensitive attributes. Including fairness in the clustering objective is especially hard for density-based clustering, as it does not directly optimize a closed form objective like centroid-based or spectral methods. This paper introduces FairDen, the first fair, density-based clustering algorithm. We capture the dataset's density-connectivity structure in a similarity matrix that we manipulate to encourage a balanced clustering. In contrast to state-of-the-art, FairDen inherently handles categorical attributes, noise, and data with several sensitive attributes or groups. We show that FairDen finds meaningful and fair clusters in extensive experiments.
Lena Krieger 0001, Anna Beer 0001, Pernille Matthews, Anneka Myrup Thiesson, Ira Assent
ICLR1
2025 LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching
abstract
The growing integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) models into high-stakes domains such as healthcare and scientific research calls for models that are not only accurate but also interpretable. Among the existing explainable methods, counterfactual explanations offer interpretability by identifying minimal changes to inputs that would alter a model’s prediction, thus providing deeper insights. However, current counterfactual generation methods suffer from critical limitations, including gradient vanishing, discontinuous latent spaces, and an overreliance on the alignment between learned and true decision boundaries. To overcome these limitations, we propose LeapFactual, a novel counterfactual explanation algorithm based on conditional flow matching. LeapFactual generates reliable and informative counterfactuals, even when true and learned decision boundaries diverge. LeapFactual is not limited to models with differentiable loss functions. It can even handle human-in-the-loop systems, expanding the scope of counterfactual explanations to domains that require the participation of human annotators, such as citizen science. We provide extensive experiments on benchmark and real-world datasets highlighting that LeapFactual generates accurate and in-distribution counterfactual explanations that offer actionable insights. We observe, for instance, that our reliable counterfactual samples with labels aligning to ground truth can be beneficially used as new training data to enhance the model. The proposed method is diversely applicable and enhances scientific knowledge discovery as well as non-expert interpretability.
Lena Krieger 0001, Hanno Scharr, Ira Assent
NeurIPS3