Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lena Krieger 0001
dblp:375/3911-1
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-1894-7539ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 82% Recommender systems · 18% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Generative modeling · 33% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
anomaly detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers · KDD (1) 2026 |
Recommender systems › explainable recommendation
counterfactual explanation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers · KDD (1) 2026 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
outlier explanation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for Outliers · KDD (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
conditional flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fair unsupervised learning
fair clustering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering · ICLR 2025 |
Data mining › clustering
density-based clustering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering · ICLR 2025 |
Data mining › clustering › constrained clustering
fair clustering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairDen: Fair Density-Based Clustering · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient-based optimization · 1.0counterfactual generation · 1.0conditional flow matching · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for OutliersabstractOutlier detection identifies data points that significantly deviate from the majority of the data distribution. Explaining outliers is crucial for understanding the underlying factors that contribute to their detection, validating their significance, and identifying potential biases or errors. Effective explanations provide actionable insights, facilitating preventive measures to avoid similar outliers in the future. Counterfactual explanations clarify why specific data points are classified as outliers by identifying minimal changes required to alter their prediction. Although valuable, most existing counterfactual explanation methods overlook the unique challenges posed by outlier detection, and fail to target classical, widely adopted outlier detection algorithms. Local Outlier Factor (LOF) is one of the most popular unsupervised outlier detection methods, quantifying outlierness through relative local density. Despite LOF's widespread use across diverse applications, it lacks interpretability. To address this limitation, we introduce Density-based Counterfactuals for Outliers (DCFO), a novel method specifically designed to generate counterfactual explanations for LOF. DCFO partitions the data space into regions where LOF behaves smoothly, enabling efficient gradient-based optimisation. Extensive experimental validation on 50 OpenML datasets demonstrates that DCFO consistently outperforms benchmarked competitors, offering superior proximity and validity of generated counterfactuals. Tommaso Amico, Pernille Matthews, Lena Krieger 0001, Arthur Zimek, Ira Assent |
KDD (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | FairDen: Fair Density-Based ClusteringabstractFairness in data mining tasks like clustering has recently become an increasingly important aspect.
However, few clustering algorithms exist that focus on fair groupings of data with sensitive attributes.
Including fairness in the clustering objective is especially hard for density-based clustering, as it does not directly optimize a closed form objective like centroid-based or spectral methods.
This paper introduces FairDen, the first fair, density-based clustering algorithm.
We capture the dataset's density-connectivity structure in a similarity matrix that we manipulate to encourage a balanced clustering.
In contrast to state-of-the-art, FairDen inherently handles categorical attributes, noise, and data with several sensitive attributes or groups.
We show that FairDen finds meaningful and fair clusters in extensive experiments. Lena Krieger 0001, Anna Beer 0001, Pernille Matthews, Anneka Myrup Thiesson, Ira Assent |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow MatchingabstractThe growing integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) models into high-stakes domains such as healthcare and scientific research calls for models that are not only accurate but also interpretable. Among the existing explainable methods, counterfactual explanations offer interpretability by identifying minimal changes to inputs that would alter a model’s prediction, thus providing deeper insights. However, current counterfactual generation methods suffer from critical limitations, including gradient vanishing, discontinuous latent spaces, and an overreliance on the alignment between learned and true decision boundaries.
To overcome these limitations, we propose LeapFactual, a novel counterfactual explanation algorithm based on conditional flow matching. LeapFactual generates reliable and informative counterfactuals, even when true and learned decision boundaries diverge. LeapFactual is not limited to models with differentiable loss functions. It can even handle human-in-the-loop systems, expanding the scope of counterfactual explanations to domains that require the participation of human annotators, such as citizen science. We provide extensive experiments on benchmark and real-world datasets highlighting that LeapFactual generates accurate and in-distribution counterfactual explanations that offer actionable insights. We observe, for instance, that our reliable counterfactual samples with labels aligning to ground truth can be beneficially used as new training data to enhance the model. The proposed method is diversely applicable and enhances scientific knowledge discovery as well as non-expert interpretability. Lena Krieger 0001, Hanno Scharr, Ira Assent |
NeurIPS | 3 |