Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Linqi Zou

dblp:375/4794 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0000-4509-2939ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Coding theory · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Cellular and mobile networks · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › insertion-deletion codes
burst deletion/insertion correction
0.812024
Error-Correcting Codes With Large Field Size Under Non-Binary Segmented Burst Deletion/Insertion Channels and Unknown Codeword Boundaries · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
code construction
0.812024
On Construction of Low-Density Parity-Check Codes for Ultra-Reliable and Low Latency Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Coding theory › code ensembles
degree distribution optimization
0.812024
On Construction of Low-Density Parity-Check Codes for Ultra-Reliable and Low Latency Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.812024
Error-Correcting Codes With Large Field Size Under Non-Binary Segmented Burst Deletion/Insertion Channels and Unknown Codeword Boundaries · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
insertion-deletion codes
0.812024
Error-Correcting Codes With Large Field Size Under Non-Binary Segmented Burst Deletion/Insertion Channels and Unknown Codeword Boundaries · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
LDPC codes
0.812024
On Construction of Low-Density Parity-Check Codes for Ultra-Reliable and Low Latency Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
MDS codes
0.812024
Error-Correcting Codes With Large Field Size Under Non-Binary Segmented Burst Deletion/Insertion Channels and Unknown Codeword Boundaries · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Cellular and mobile networks
5g
0.212024
On Construction of Low-Density Parity-Check Codes for Ultra-Reliable and Low Latency Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Cellular and mobile networks › low-latency communication
ultra-reliable low-latency communication
0.212024
On Construction of Low-Density Parity-Check Codes for Ultra-Reliable and Low Latency Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024
Coding theory › sequences
de bruijn sequences
0.212024
Error-Correcting Codes With Large Field Size Under Non-Binary Segmented Burst Deletion/Insertion Channels and Unknown Codeword Boundaries · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

masking technique · 1.5quadratic residue codes · 0.8quadratic residue code · 0.8progressive-edge-growth algorithm · 0.8progressive edge-growth algorithm · 0.8marker codes · 0.8de bruijn sequences · 0.8MDS codes · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Error-Correcting Codes With Large Field Size Under Non-Binary Segmented Burst Deletion/Insertion Channels and Unknown Codeword Boundaries
abstract
In this paper, we construct non-binary codes of lengthNwhich correct errors under a non-binary segment-Nmaxburst-Ddeletion and maxburst-Sinsertion (NB-SBDI(N, D, S)) channel without knowing the codeword boundaries. In this NB-SBDI(N, D, S) channel, at most a single non-binary burst (a block of consecutive bits/symbols) of deletions or insertions of length up toDorS, respectively, exists in a block ofNconsecutive non-binary symbols. One code named as BM-DB-MDS consists of a maximum distance separable (MDS) code, a block of periodic de Bruijn (DB) symbols, and a block of proposed periodic binary marker (BM) patterns with a period ofS+D+ 2. The other code called BM-MDS code consists of a BM code and an MDS code. We show that the rates of BM-DB-MDS and BM-MDS codes achieve λ/λ+1 (1 - 1/2t), λ ∈ N+and 1 - 1/t, respectively, whenN→ +∞, where λ represent the MDS code shortening factor, and 1/tis the rough proportion of the maximum length of burst deletions or insertions allowed in a code.
Linqi Zou, Yong Li 0023, Zhaoyang Qiu, Youqiang Hu, Francis C. M. Lau 0002
IEEE Trans. Commun.2
2024 On Construction of Low-Density Parity-Check Codes for Ultra-Reliable and Low Latency Communications
abstract
Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes with protograph-based raptor-like (PBRL) structure have been chosen as the data channel coding scheme for the fifth-generation (5G) enhanced mobile broad band (eMBB) services. However, these 5G LDPC codes are not optimized for the scenarios of Ultra Reliable and Low Latency Communications (URLLC) and massive Machine Type Communications (mMTC) in which small transport block sizes are usually used. In this paper, a new method is proposed to construct PBRL LDPC codes for URLLC and mMTC. This method incorporates degree-distribution optimization, base matrix derived from parity-check matrix of quadratic residue codes, masking technique and modified progressive-edge-growth (PEG) algorithm. Simulation results show that the proposed PBRL LDPC codes outperform 5G LDPC short codes in terms of error-correcting performance.
Linqi Zou, Yong Li 0023, Pingping Chen 0001, Francis C. M. Lau 0002
IEEE Trans. Commun.1