VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shokufeh Kazemloo
dblp:375/6312
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-7884-4718ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Distributed computing theory · 77% Automated reasoning and model checking · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification › dynamic verification › runtime verification
decentralized monitoring |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Crash-Resilient Decentralized Synchronous Runtime Verification · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Program verification › dynamic verification
runtime verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Crash-Resilient Decentralized Synchronous Runtime Verification · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Distributed computing theory › timing models
synchronous systems |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Crash-Resilient Decentralized Synchronous Runtime Verification · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › runtime verification
monitor synthesis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Crash-Resilient Decentralized Synchronous Runtime Verification · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic verdict · 1.5automata-based monitoring · 1.5SMT-based synthesis · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Crash-Resilient Decentralized Synchronous Runtime VerificationabstractRuntime verificationis a technique, where amonitorprocess extracts information from a running system in order to evaluate whether system executions violate or satisfy a given correctness specification. In this paper, we consider runtime verification of synchronous distributed systems, where a set of decentralized monitors that only have a partial view of the system are subject tocrash failures. In this context, it is unavoidable that monitors may have different views of the underlying system, and, therefore, have different opinions about the correctness property. We propose an automata-based synchronous monitoring algorithm that copes with$t$crash monitor failures. In our proposed approach, local monitors do not communicate their explicit reading of the underlying system. Rather, they emit asymbolic verdictthat efficiently encodes their partial views. This significantly reduces the communication overhead. To this end, we also introduce an (offline) SMT-based monitor synthesis algorithm, which results in minimizing the size of monitoring messages. We evaluate our algorithm on a wide range of formulas and observe an average of 2.5 times increase in the number of states of the monitor automaton. Ritam Ganguly, Shokufeh Kazemloo, Borzoo Bonakdarpour |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 2 |