María Grandury, Javier Aula-Blasco, Júlia Falcão, Clémentine Fourrier, Miguel González Saiz, Gonzalo Martínez, Gonzalo Santamaria Gomez, Rodrigo Agerri, Nuria Aldama García, Luis Chiruzzo, Javier Conde, Helena Gomez Adorno, Marta Guerrero Nieto, Guido Ivetta, Natàlia López Fuertes, Flor Miriam Plaza-del-Arco, María-Teresa Martín-Valdivia, Helena Montoro Zamorano, Carmen Muñoz Sanz, Pedro Reviriego, Leire Rosado Plaza, Alejandro Vaca Serrano, Estrella Vallecillo-Rodríguez, Jorge Vallego, Irune Zubiaga. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.

Guido Ivetta, Marcos J Gomez, Sofía Martinelli, Pietro Palombini, M Emilia Echeveste, Nair Carolina Mazzeo, Beatriz Busaniche, Luciana Benotti. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.

Warning: This paper contains explicit statements of offensive stereotypes which may be upsetting The study of bias, fairness and social impact in Natural Language Processing (NLP) lacks resources in languages other than English. Our objective is to support the evaluation of bias in language models in a multilingual setting. We use stereotypes across nine types of biases to build a corpus containing contrasting sentence pairs, one sentence that presents a stereotype concerning an underadvantaged group and another minimally changed sentence, concerning a matching advantaged group. We build on the French CrowS-Pairs corpus and guidelines to provide translations of the existing material into seven additional languages. In total, we produce 11,139 new sentence pairs that cover stereotypes dealing with nine types of biases in seven cultural contexts. We use the final resource for the evaluation of relevant monolingual and multilingual masked language models. We find that language models in all languages favor sentences that express stereotypes in most bias categories. The process of creating a resource that covers a wide range of language types and cultural settings highlights the difficulty of bias evaluation, in particular comparability across languages and contexts.

Visual Question Answering~(VQA) is an important task in multimodal AI, which requires models to understand and reason on knowledge present in visual and textual data. However, most of the current VQA datasets and models are primarily focused on English and a few major world languages, with images that are Western-centric. While recent efforts have tried to increase the number of languages covered on VQA datasets, they still lack diversity in low-resource languages. More importantly, some datasets extend the text to other languages, either via translation or some other approaches, but usually keep the same images, resulting in narrow cultural representation. To address these limitations, we create CVQA, a new Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering benchmark dataset, designed to cover a rich set of languages and regions, where we engage native speakers and cultural experts in the data collection process. CVQA includes culturally-driven images and questions from across 28 countries in four continents, covering 26 languages with 11 scripts, providing a total of 9k questions. We benchmark several Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on CVQA, and we show that the dataset is challenging for the current state-of-the-art models. This benchmark will serve as a probing evaluation suite for assessing the cultural bias of multimodal models and hopefully encourage more research efforts towards increasing cultural awareness and linguistic diversity in this field.