Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lingdi Kong

dblp:375/9599 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
1.012026
SURE or Not? Investigating Semantic Understanding in Dense Retrieval Models · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark
1.012026
SURE or Not? Investigating Semantic Understanding in Dense Retrieval Models · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
1.012026
SURE or Not? Investigating Semantic Understanding in Dense Retrieval Models · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.0dense retrieval models · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 SURE or Not? Investigating Semantic Understanding in Dense Retrieval Models
abstract
Dense retrieval has become a core technique in applications like web search and retrievalaugmented generation.Despite their empirical success, it remains unclear whether these models truly understand semantics, and to what degree they can represent semantic consistency and distinguish subtle semantic differences.To address this gap, this paper conducts a systematic investigation by introducing SURE, a benchmark for Semantic Understanding in dense REtrieval built upon the MSMARCO, NQ, and FiQA datasets.SURE characterizes semantic understanding in dense retrieval along three dimensions: semantic precision, semantic abstraction, and semantic equivalence.We evaluate ten representative models ranging from 110M to 8B parameters, including both generalpurpose and domain-specific models.Results show that current dense retrievers struggle to distinguish fine-grained semantic differences across texts with varying information density, and to recognize semantic consistency under lexical paraphrasing.Moreover, larger models do not necessarily exhibit stronger semantic understanding, and diverse training data generally enhances semantic understanding on challenging retrieval tasks.
Lingdi Kong, Xuanang Chen, Ben He 0001, Le Sun 0001
ACL (1)1
2024 A multi-type vulnerability detection framework with parallel perspective fusion and hierarchical feature enhancement
Lingdi Kong, Senlin Luo, Limin Pan, Zhouting Wu, Xinshuai Li
Comput. Secur.1