Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lingdi Kong
dblp:375/9599
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SURE or Not? Investigating Semantic Understanding in Dense Retrieval Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SURE or Not? Investigating Semantic Understanding in Dense Retrieval Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SURE or Not? Investigating Semantic Understanding in Dense Retrieval Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.0dense retrieval models · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | SURE or Not? Investigating Semantic Understanding in Dense Retrieval ModelsabstractDense retrieval has become a core technique in applications like web search and retrievalaugmented generation.Despite their empirical success, it remains unclear whether these models truly understand semantics, and to what degree they can represent semantic consistency and distinguish subtle semantic differences.To address this gap, this paper conducts a systematic investigation by introducing SURE, a benchmark for Semantic Understanding in dense REtrieval built upon the MSMARCO, NQ, and FiQA datasets.SURE characterizes semantic understanding in dense retrieval along three dimensions: semantic precision, semantic abstraction, and semantic equivalence.We evaluate ten representative models ranging from 110M to 8B parameters, including both generalpurpose and domain-specific models.Results show that current dense retrievers struggle to distinguish fine-grained semantic differences across texts with varying information density, and to recognize semantic consistency under lexical paraphrasing.Moreover, larger models do not necessarily exhibit stronger semantic understanding, and diverse training data generally enhances semantic understanding on challenging retrieval tasks. Lingdi Kong, Xuanang Chen, Ben He 0001, Le Sun 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | A multi-type vulnerability detection framework with parallel perspective fusion and hierarchical feature enhancement
Lingdi Kong, Senlin Luo, Limin Pan, Zhouting Wu, Xinshuai Li |
Comput. Secur. | 1 |