Navve Wasserman

dblp:376/1496 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-4061-2473ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 51% Language models and text generation · 26% Vision and language · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Paint by Inpaint: Learning to Add Image Objects by Removing Them First · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image restoration
image inpainting
0.912025
Paint by Inpaint: Learning to Add Image Objects by Removing Them First · CVPR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
DocReRank: Single-Page Hard Negative Query Generation for Training Multi-Modal RAG Rerankers · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
hard negative mining
0.912025
DocReRank: Single-Page Hard Negative Query Generation for Training Multi-Modal RAG Rerankers · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
multimodal retrieval
0.912025
REAL-MM-RAG: A Real-World Multi-Modal Retrieval Benchmark · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval
reranking
0.912025
DocReRank: Single-Page Hard Negative Query Generation for Training Multi-Modal RAG Rerankers · EMNLP 2025
Visual content generation and editing
image editing
0.912025
Paint by Inpaint: Learning to Add Image Objects by Removing Them First · CVPR 2025
Visual content generation and editing › image editing › image compositing
object insertion
0.912025
Paint by Inpaint: Learning to Add Image Objects by Removing Them First · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning
0.312025
Paint by Inpaint: Learning to Add Image Objects by Removing Them First · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.312025
Paint by Inpaint: Learning to Add Image Objects by Removing Them First · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 3.5large language model · 3.5vision-language model evaluation · 1.7retrieval benchmark construction · 1.7query generation · 1.7inpainting · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 REAL-MM-RAG: A Real-World Multi-Modal Retrieval Benchmark
abstract
Navve Wasserman, Roi Pony, Oshri Naparstek, Adi Raz Goldfarb, Eli Schwartz, Udi Barzelay, Leonid Karlinsky. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Navve Wasserman, Roi Pony, Oshri Naparstek, Adi Raz Goldfarb, Eli Schwartz, Udi Barzelay, Leonid Karlinsky
ACL (1)1
2025 Paint by Inpaint: Learning to Add Image Objects by Removing Them First
abstract
Image editing has advanced significantly with the introduction of text-conditioned diffusion models. Despite this progress, seamlessly adding objects to images based on textual instructions without requiring user-provided input masks remains a challenge. We address this by leveraging the insight that removing objects (Inpaint) is significantly simpler than its inverse process of adding them (Paint), attributed to inpainting models that benefit from segmentation mask guidance. Capitalizing on this realization, by implementing an automated and extensive pipeline, we curate a filtered large-scale image dataset containing pairs of images and their corresponding object-removed versions. Using these pairs, we train a diffusion model to inverse the inpainting process, effectively adding objects into images. Unlike other editing datasets, ours features natural target images instead of synthetic ones while ensuring source-target consistency by construction. Additionally, we utilize a large Vision-Language Model to provide detailed descriptions of the removed objects and a Large Language Model to convert these descriptions into diverse, natural-language instructions. Our quantitative and qualitative results show that the trained model surpasses existing models in both object addition and general editing tasks. Visit our project page for the released dataset and trained models.
Navve Wasserman, Noam Rotstein, Roy Ganz, Ron Kimmel
CVPR1
2025 DocReRank: Single-Page Hard Negative Query Generation for Training Multi-Modal RAG Rerankers
abstract
Rerankers play a critical role in multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) by refining ranking of an initial set of retrieved documents.Rerankers are typically trained using hard negative mining, whose goal is to select pages for each query which rank high, but are actually irrelevant.However, this selection process is typically passive and restricted to what the retriever can find in the available corpus, leading to several inherent limitations.These include: limited diversity, negative examples which are often not hard enough, low controllability, and frequent false negatives which harm training.Our paper proposes an alternative approach: Single-Page Hard Negative Query Generation, which goes the other way around.Instead of retrieving negative pages per query, we generate hard negative queries per page.Using an automated LLM-VLM pipeline, and given a page and its positive query, we create hard negatives by rephrasing the query to be as similar as possible in form and context, yet not answerable from the page.This paradigm enables fine-grained control over the generated queries, resulting in diverse, hard, and targeted negatives.It also supports efficient false negative verification.Our experiments show that rerankers trained with data generated using our approach outperform existing models and significantly improve retrieval performance 1 .
Navve Wasserman, Oliver Heinimann, Yuval Golbari, Tal Zimbalist, Eli Schwartz, Michal Irani
EMNLP1