Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Plesner

dblp:377/0305 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8596-8103ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
logic gate networks
0.912025
Mind the Gap: Removing the Discretization Gap in Differentiable Logic Gate Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval › dense retrieval
bi-encoder retrieval
0.912025
ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Drafting · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark
0.912025
ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Drafting · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.912025
ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Drafting · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
0.312025
ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Drafting · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

straight-through estimator · 0.9pointwise ranking · 0.9hessian regularization · 0.9gumbel noise · 0.9bi-encoder retriever · 0.9LLM re-ranker · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Drafting
abstract
Contract clause retrieval is foundational to contract drafting because lawyers rarely draft contracts from scratch; instead, they locate and revise the most relevant precedent clauses. We introduce the Atticus Clause Retrieval Dataset (ACORD), the first expert-annotated benchmark specifically designed for contract clause retrieval to support contract drafting tasks. ACORD focuses on complex contract clauses such as Limitation of Liability, Indemnification, Change of Control, and Most Favored Nation. It includes 114 queries and over 126,000 query-clause pairs, each ranked on a scale from 1 to 5 stars. The task is to find the most relevant precedent clauses to a query. The bi-encoder retriever paired with pointwise LLMs re-rankers shows promising results. However, substantial improvements are still needed to manage the complex legal work typically undertaken by lawyers effectively. As the first expert-annotated benchmark for contract clause retrieval, ACORD can serve as a valuable IR benchmark for the NLP community.
Steven H. Wang, Maksim Zubkov, Kexin Fan, Sarah Harrell, Andreas Plesner, Roger Wattenhofer
ACL (1)7
2025 Universality Frontier for Asynchronous Cellular Automata
abstract
In this work, we investigate computational aspects of asynchronous cellular automata (ACAs), a modification of cellular automata in which cells update independently, following an asynchronous update schedule. We introduce flip automata networks (FANs), a simple modification of automata networks that remain robust under any asynchronous updating order. By using FANs as a middleman, we show that asynchronous automata can efficiently simulate their synchronous counterparts with a linear memory overhead, which improves upon the previously established quadratic bound. Additionally, we address the universality gap for (a)synchronous cellular automata-the boundary separating universal and non-universal automata, which is still not fully understood. We tighten this boundary by proving that all one-way asynchronous automata lack universal computational power. Conversely, we establish the existence of a universal asynchronous 6-state first-neighbor automaton in one dimension and a 3-state von Neumann automaton in two dimensions, which represent the smallest known universal constructions to date.
Ivan Baburin, Florian Grötschla, Andreas Plesner, Roger Wattenhofer
MFCS4
2025 Mind the Gap: Removing the Discretization Gap in Differentiable Logic Gate Networks
abstract
Modern neural networks exhibit state-of-the-art performance on many existing benchmarks, but their high computational requirements and energy usage cause researchers to explore more efficient solutions for real-world deployment. Differentiable logic gate networks (DLGNs) learns a large network of logic gates for efficient image classification. However, learning a network that can solve simple problems like CIFAR-10 or CIFAR-100 can take days to weeks to train. Even then, almost half of the neurons remains unused, causing a \emph{discretization gap}. This discretization gap hinders real-world deployment of DLGNs, as the performance drop between training and inference negatively impacts accuracy. We inject Gumbel noise with a straight-through estimator during training to significantly speed up training, improve neuron utilization, and decrease the discretization gap. We theoretically show that this results from implicit Hessian regularization, which improves the convergence properties of DLGNs. We train networks $4.5 \times$ faster in wall-clock time, reduce the discretization gap by 98\%, and reduce the number of unused gates by 100\%.
Shakir Yousefi, Andreas Plesner, Till Aczel, Roger Wattenhofer
NeurIPS2
2024 Breaking reCAPTCHAv2
abstract
Our work examines the efficacy of employing advanced machine learning methods to solve captchas from Google's reCAPTCHAv2 system. We evaluate the effectiveness of automated systems in solving captchas by utilizing advanced YOLO models for image segmentation and classification. Our main result is that we can solve 100% of the captchas, while previous work only solved 68–71 %. Furthermore, our findings suggest that there is no significant difference in the number of challenges humans and bots must solve to pass the captchas in reCAPTCHAv2. This implies that current AI technologies can exploit advanced image-based captchas. We also look under the hood of reCAPTCHAv2, and find evidence that reCAPTCHAv2 is heavily based on cookie and browser history data when evaluating whether a user is human or not. The code is provided alongside this paper.11https://github.com/aplesner/Breaking-reCAPTCHAv2
Andreas Plesner, Tobias Vontobel, Roger Wattenhofer
COMPSAC1
2024 Detecting Railway Track Irregularities Using Conformal Prediction
Andreas Plesner, Allan P. Engsig-Karup, Hans True
ICANN (9)1
2024 Accurate Computation of the Logarithm of Modified Bessel Functions on GPUs
abstract
Bessel functions are critical in scientific computing for applications such as machine learning, protein structure modeling, and robotics. However, currently, available routines lack precision or fail for certain input ranges, such as when the order v is large, and GPU-specific implementations are limited. We address the precision limitations of current numerical implementations while dramatically improving the runtime. We propose two novel algorithms for computing the logarithm of modified Bessel functions of the first and second kinds by computing intermediate values on a logarithmic scale. Our algorithms are robust and never have issues with underflows or overflows while having relative errors on the order of machine precision, even for inputs where existing libraries fail. In C++/CUDA, our algorithms have median and maximum speedups of 45x and 6150x for GPU and 17x and 3403x for CPU, respectively, over the ranges of inputs and third-party libraries tested. Compared to SciPy, the algorithms have median and maximum speedups of 77x and 300x for GPU and 35x and 98x for CPU, respectively, over the ranges of inputs tested.
Andreas Plesner, Hans Henrik Brandenborg Sørensen, Søren Hauberg
ICS1
2024 What is the Price for Lending in Financial Networks?
Beni Egressy, Andreas Plesner, Roger Wattenhofer
PRIMA2