Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Plesner
dblp:377/0305
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8596-8103ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
logic gate networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mind the Gap: Removing the Discretization Gap in Differentiable Logic Gate Networks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval › dense retrieval
bi-encoder retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Drafting · ACL (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Drafting · ACL (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Drafting · ACL (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract Drafting · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
straight-through estimator · 0.9pointwise ranking · 0.9hessian regularization · 0.9gumbel noise · 0.9bi-encoder retriever · 0.9LLM re-ranker · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ACORD: An Expert-Annotated Retrieval Dataset for Legal Contract DraftingabstractContract clause retrieval is foundational to contract drafting because lawyers rarely draft contracts from scratch; instead, they locate and revise the most relevant precedent clauses. We introduce the Atticus Clause Retrieval Dataset (ACORD), the first expert-annotated benchmark specifically designed for contract clause retrieval to support contract drafting tasks. ACORD focuses on complex contract clauses such as Limitation of Liability, Indemnification, Change of Control, and Most Favored Nation. It includes 114 queries and over 126,000 query-clause pairs, each ranked on a scale from 1 to 5 stars. The task is to find the most relevant precedent clauses to a query. The bi-encoder retriever paired with pointwise LLMs re-rankers shows promising results. However, substantial improvements are still needed to manage the complex legal work typically undertaken by lawyers effectively. As the first expert-annotated benchmark for contract clause retrieval, ACORD can serve as a valuable IR benchmark for the NLP community. Steven H. Wang, Maksim Zubkov, Kexin Fan, Sarah Harrell, Andreas Plesner, Roger Wattenhofer |
ACL (1) | 7 |
| 2025 | Universality Frontier for Asynchronous Cellular AutomataabstractIn this work, we investigate computational aspects of asynchronous cellular automata (ACAs), a modification of cellular automata in which cells update independently, following an asynchronous update schedule. We introduce flip automata networks (FANs), a simple modification of automata networks that remain robust under any asynchronous updating order. By using FANs as a middleman, we show that asynchronous automata can efficiently simulate their synchronous counterparts with a linear memory overhead, which improves upon the previously established quadratic bound. Additionally, we address the universality gap for (a)synchronous cellular automata-the boundary separating universal and non-universal automata, which is still not fully understood. We tighten this boundary by proving that all one-way asynchronous automata lack universal computational power. Conversely, we establish the existence of a universal asynchronous 6-state first-neighbor automaton in one dimension and a 3-state von Neumann automaton in two dimensions, which represent the smallest known universal constructions to date. Ivan Baburin, Florian Grötschla, Andreas Plesner, Roger Wattenhofer |
MFCS | 4 |
| 2025 | Mind the Gap: Removing the Discretization Gap in Differentiable Logic Gate NetworksabstractModern neural networks exhibit state-of-the-art performance on many existing benchmarks, but their high computational requirements and energy usage cause researchers to explore more efficient solutions for real-world deployment.
Differentiable logic gate networks (DLGNs) learns a large network of logic gates for efficient image classification. However, learning a network that can solve simple problems like CIFAR-10 or CIFAR-100 can take days to weeks to train. Even then, almost half of the neurons remains unused, causing a \emph{discretization gap}. This discretization gap hinders real-world deployment of DLGNs, as the performance drop between training and inference negatively impacts accuracy.
We inject Gumbel noise with a straight-through estimator during training to significantly speed up training, improve neuron utilization, and decrease the discretization gap.
We theoretically show that this results from implicit Hessian regularization, which improves the convergence properties of DLGNs. We train networks $4.5 \times$ faster in wall-clock time, reduce the discretization gap by 98\%, and reduce the number of unused gates by 100\%. Shakir Yousefi, Andreas Plesner, Till Aczel, Roger Wattenhofer |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Breaking reCAPTCHAv2abstractOur work examines the efficacy of employing advanced machine learning methods to solve captchas from Google's reCAPTCHAv2 system. We evaluate the effectiveness of automated systems in solving captchas by utilizing advanced YOLO models for image segmentation and classification. Our main result is that we can solve 100% of the captchas, while previous work only solved 68–71 %. Furthermore, our findings suggest that there is no significant difference in the number of challenges humans and bots must solve to pass the captchas in reCAPTCHAv2. This implies that current AI technologies can exploit advanced image-based captchas. We also look under the hood of reCAPTCHAv2, and find evidence that reCAPTCHAv2 is heavily based on cookie and browser history data when evaluating whether a user is human or not. The code is provided alongside this paper.11https://github.com/aplesner/Breaking-reCAPTCHAv2 Andreas Plesner, Tobias Vontobel, Roger Wattenhofer |
COMPSAC | 1 |
| 2024 | Detecting Railway Track Irregularities Using Conformal Prediction
Andreas Plesner, Allan P. Engsig-Karup, Hans True |
ICANN (9) | 1 |
| 2024 | Accurate Computation of the Logarithm of Modified Bessel Functions on GPUsabstractBessel functions are critical in scientific computing for applications such as machine learning, protein structure modeling, and robotics. However, currently, available routines lack precision or fail for certain input ranges, such as when the order v is large, and GPU-specific implementations are limited. We address the precision limitations of current numerical implementations while dramatically improving the runtime. We propose two novel algorithms for computing the logarithm of modified Bessel functions of the first and second kinds by computing intermediate values on a logarithmic scale. Our algorithms are robust and never have issues with underflows or overflows while having relative errors on the order of machine precision, even for inputs where existing libraries fail. In C++/CUDA, our algorithms have median and maximum speedups of 45x and 6150x for GPU and 17x and 3403x for CPU, respectively, over the ranges of inputs and third-party libraries tested. Compared to SciPy, the algorithms have median and maximum speedups of 77x and 300x for GPU and 35x and 98x for CPU, respectively, over the ranges of inputs tested. Andreas Plesner, Hans Henrik Brandenborg Sørensen, Søren Hauberg |
ICS | 1 |
| 2024 | What is the Price for Lending in Financial Networks?
Beni Egressy, Andreas Plesner, Roger Wattenhofer |
PRIMA | 2 |