Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tifanny Portela

dblp:377/3414 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 42% Robot manipulation · 29% Legged, aerial and field robots · 29%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › mobile manipulation
legged manipulation
1.622025
Whole-Body End-Effector Pose Tracking · ICRA 2025
Learning Force Control for Legged Manipulation · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion
1.622025
Whole-Body End-Effector Pose Tracking · ICRA 2025
Learning Force Control for Legged Manipulation · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
whole-body control
0.912025
Whole-Body End-Effector Pose Tracking · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › contact control › contact task control › robot force control
contact force control
0.812024
Learning Force Control for Legged Manipulation · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
force control
0.812024
Learning Force Control for Legged Manipulation · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.6terrain-aware sampling · 0.9curriculum learning · 0.9end-to-end policy · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Whole-Body End-Effector Pose Tracking
abstract
Combining manipulation with the mobility of legged robots is essential for a wide range of robotic applications. However, integrating an arm with a mobile base significantly increases the system's complexity, making precise end-effector control challenging. Existing model-based approaches are often constrained by their modeling assumptions, leading to limited robustness. Meanwhile, recent Reinforcement Learning (RL) implementations restrict the arm's workspace to be in front of the robot or track only the position to obtain decent tracking accuracy. In this work, we address these limitations by introducing a whole-body RL formulation for end-effector pose tracking in a large workspace on rough, unstructured terrains. Our proposed method involves a terrain-aware sampling strategy for the robot's initial configuration and end-effector pose commands, as well as a game-based curriculum to extend the robot's operating range. We validate our approach on the ANYmal quadrupedal robot with a six DoF robotic arm. Through our experiments, we show that the learned controller achieves precise command tracking over a large workspace and adapts across varying terrains such as stairs and slopes. On deployment, it achieves a pose-tracking error of 2.64 cm and 3.64°, outperforming existing competitive baselines. The video of our work is available at: wholebody-pose-tracking.
Tifanny Portela, Andrei Cramariuc, Mayank Mittal, Marco Hutter 0001
ICRA1
2024 Learning Force Control for Legged Manipulation
abstract
Controlling the contact force during interactions is an inherent requirement for locomotion and manipulation tasks. Current reinforcement learning approaches to locomotion and manipulation rely implicitly on forceful interaction to accomplish tasks but do not explicitly regulate it. This paper proposes a reinforcement learning task specification that focuses on matching desired contact force levels. Integrating force control with the coordination of a robot’s body and arm, we present an end-to-end policy for legged manipulator control. Force control enables us to realize compliant gripper and whole-body pulling movements that have not been previously demonstrated using a learned policy. It also facilitates a characterization of the force-tracking performance of learned policies in simulation and the real world, indicating their performance potential for force-critical tasks. Video is available at the project website: https://tif-twirl-13.github.io/learning-compliance.
Tifanny Portela, Gabriel B. Margolis, Yandong Ji, Pulkit Agrawal 0001
ICRA1