Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haran Raajesh

dblp:377/6423 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 68% Machine translation · 32%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
large language model translation
0.912025
Lost in Translation, Found in Context: Sign Language Translation with Contextual Cues · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
sign language translation
0.912025
Lost in Translation, Found in Context: Sign Language Translation with Contextual Cues · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › caption generation
image and video captioning
0.812024
MICap: A Unified Model for Identity-Aware Movie Descriptions · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › image captioning
image caption evaluation
0.812024
MICap: A Unified Model for Identity-Aware Movie Descriptions · CVPR 2024
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
multimodal machine translation
0.312025
Lost in Translation, Found in Context: Sign Language Translation with Contextual Cues · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pseudo-glosses · 0.9large language model fine-tuning · 0.9contextual cues · 0.9scene graph · 0.8fill-in-the-blanks · 0.8autoregressive decoder · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Lost in Translation, Found in Context: Sign Language Translation with Contextual Cues
abstract
Our objective is to translate continuous sign language into spoken language text. Inspired by the way human interpreters rely on context for accurate translation, we incorporate additional contextual cues together with the signing video, into a new translation framework. Specifically, besides visual sign recognition features that encode the input video, we integrate complementary textual information from (i) captions describing the background show, (ii) translation of previous sentences, as well as (iii) pseudo-glosses transcribing the signing. These are automatically extracted and inputted along with the visual features to a pre-trained large language model (LLM), which we fine-tune to generate spoken language translations in text form. Through extensive ablation studies, we show the positive contribution of each input cue to the translation performance. We train and evaluate our approach on BOBSL – the largest British Sign Language dataset currently available. We show that our contextual approach significantly enhances the quality of the translations compared to previously reported results on BOBSL, and also to state-of-the-art methods that we implement as baselines. Furthermore, we demonstrate the generality of our approach by applying it also to How2Sign, an American Sign Language dataset, and achieve competitive results.
Youngjoon Jang 0001, Haran Raajesh, Liliane Momeni, Gül Varol, Andrew Zisserman
CVPR2
2024 MICap: A Unified Model for Identity-Aware Movie Descriptions
abstract
Characters are an important aspect of any storyline and identifying and including them in descriptions is necessary for story understanding. While previous work has largely ignored identity and generated captions with some-one (anonymized names), recent work formulates id-aware captioning as a fill-in-the-blanks (FITB) task, where, given a caption with blanks, the goal is to predict person id labels. However, to predict captions with ids, a two-stage approach is required: first predict captions with someone, then fill in identities. In this work, we present a new single stage approach that can seamlessly switch between id-aware caption generation or FITB when given a caption with blanks. Our model, Movie-Identity Captioner (MI-Cap), uses a shared auto-regressive decoder that benefits from training with FITB and full-caption generation ob-jectives, while the encoder can benefit from or disregard captions with blanks as input. Another challenge with id-aware captioning is the lack of a metric to capture subtle differences between person ids. To this end, we introduce iSPICE, a caption evaluation metric that focuses on identity tuples created through intermediate scene graphs. We eval-uate MICap on Large-Scale Movie Description Challenge (LSMDC), where we show a 4.2% improvement in FITB accuracy, and a 1-2% bump in classic captioning metrics.
Haran Raajesh, Naveen Reddy Desanur, Zeeshan Khan, Makarand Tapaswi
CVPR1