Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luxi Lin

dblp:377/8604 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Vision and language · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
efficient multimodal inference
0.912025
Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inference · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference acceleration
0.912025
Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inference · AAAI 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inference · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › token compression
visual token reduction
0.912025
Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inference · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

attention sink analysis · 0.9KL divergence criterion · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid Inference
abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) demand considerable computations for inference due to the extensive parameters and the additional input tokens needed for visual information representation. Herein, we introduce Visual Tokens Withdrawal (VTW), a plug-and-play module to boost MLLMs for rapid inference. Our approach is inspired by two intriguing phenomena we have observed: (1) the attention sink phenomenon that is prevalent in LLMs also persists in MLLMs, suggesting that initial tokens and nearest tokens receive the majority of attention, while middle vision tokens garner minimal attention in deep layers; (2) the presence of information migration, which implies that visual information is transferred to subsequent text tokens within the first few layers of MLLMs. As per our findings, we conclude that vision tokens are unnecessary in the deep layers of MLLMs. Thus, we strategically withdraw them at a certain layer, enabling only text tokens to engage in subsequent layers. To pinpoint the ideal layer for VTW, we initially analyze a limited set of tiny datasets and choose the first layer that meets the Kullback-Leibler divergence criterion. Our VTW approach can cut computational overhead by over 40% across diverse multimodal tasks while maintaining performance.
Zhihang Lin, Mingbao Lin, Luxi Lin, Rongrong Ji
AAAI3