Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Surya Koppisetti
dblp:377/8782
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Audio and music processing › audio security
audio deepfake detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SLIM: Style-Linguistics Mismatch Model for Generalized Audio Deepfake Detection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › deepfake detection
audio-visual deepfake detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AVFF: Audio-Visual Feature Fusion for Video Deepfake Detection · CVPR 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
deepfake detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AVFF: Audio-Visual Feature Fusion for Video Deepfake Detection · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multimodal representation learning
cross-modal representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | AVFF: Audio-Visual Feature Fusion for Video Deepfake Detection · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › model explanation
decision explanation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SLIM: Style-Linguistics Mismatch Model for Generalized Audio Deepfake Detection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SLIM: Style-Linguistics Mismatch Model for Generalized Audio Deepfake Detection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SLIM: Style-Linguistics Mismatch Model for Generalized Audio Deepfake Detection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wav2vec features · 1.5feature fusion · 1.5contrastive learning · 1.5complementary masking · 1.5autoencoding · 1.5self-supervised pretraining · 0.8self-supervised pre-training · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | What Does an Audio Deepfake Detector Focus on? A Study in the Time DomainabstractAdding explanations to audio deepfake detection (ADD) models will enable insights on the decision making process and thus boost their real-world application. In this paper, we propose a relevancy-based explainable AI (XAI) method to analyze the predictions of transformer-based ADD models. We compare against standard Grad-CAM and SHAP-based methods, using quantitative faithfulness metrics as well as a partial spoof test, to comprehensively analyze the relative importance of different temporal regions in an audio. We consider large datasets, unlike previous works where only limited utterances are studied, and find that the XAI methods differ in their explanations. The proposed relevancy-based XAI method performs the best overall on a variety of metrics. Further investigation on the relative importance of speech/non-speech, phonetic content, and voice onsets/offsets suggests that the XAI results obtained from a limited set of utterances do not necessarily hold when evaluated on large datasets. Petr Grinberg, Surya Koppisetti, Gaurav Bharaj |
ICASSP | 3 |
| 2025 | A Data-Driven Diffusion-based Approach for Audio Deepfake ExplanationsabstractEvaluating explainability techniques, such as SHAP and LRP, in the context of audio deepfake detection is challenging due to lack of clear ground truth annotations. In the cases when we are able to obtain the ground truth, we find that these methods struggle to provide accurate explanations. In this work, we propose a novel data-driven approach to identify artifact regions in deepfake audio. We consider paired real and vocoded audio, and use the difference in time-frequency representation as the ground-truth explanation. The difference signal then serves as a supervision to train a diffusion model to expose the deepfake artifacts in a given vocoded audio. Experimental results on the VocV4 and LibriSeVoc datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms traditional explainability techniques, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Petr Grinberg, Surya Koppisetti, Gaurav Bharaj |
INTERSPEECH | 3 |
| 2024 | AVFF: Audio-Visual Feature Fusion for Video Deepfake DetectionabstractWith the rapid growth in deepfake video content, we re-quire improved and generalizable methods to detect them. Most existing detection methods either use uni-modal cues or rely on supervised training to capture the dissonance be-tween the audio and visual modalities. While the former disregards the audio-visual correspondences entirely, the lat-ter predominantly focuses on discerning audio-visual cues within the training corpus, thereby potentially overlooking correspondences that can help detect unseen deepfakes. We present Audio- Visual Feature Fusion (AVFF), a two-stage cross-modal learning method that explicitly captures the correspondence between the audio and visual modalities for improved deepfake detection. The first stage pursues representation learning via self-supervision on real videos to capture the intrinsic audio-visual correspondences. To extract rich cross-modal representations, we use contrastive learning and autoencoding objectives, and introduce a novel audio-visual complementary masking and feature fusion strategy. The learned representations are tuned in the second stage, where deepfake classification is pursued via super-vised learning on both real and fake videos. Extensive exper-iments and analysis suggest that our novel representation learning paradigm is highly discriminative in nature. We report 98.6% accuracy and 99.1% AUC on the FakeAVCeleb dataset, outperforming the current audio-visual state-of-the-art by 14.9% and 9.9%, respectively. Trevine Oorloff, Surya Koppisetti, Nicolò Bonettini, Divyaraj Solanki, Ben Colman, Yaser Yacoob, Ali Shahriyari, Gaurav Bharaj |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2024 | SLIM: Style-Linguistics Mismatch Model for Generalized Audio Deepfake DetectionabstractAudio deepfake detection (ADD) is crucial to combat the misuse of speech synthesized by generative AI models. Existing ADD models suffer from generalization issues to unseen attacks, with a large performance discrepancy between in-domain and out-of-domain data. Moreover, the black-box nature of existing models limits their use in real-world scenarios, where explanations are required for model decisions. To alleviate these issues, we introduce a new ADD model that explicitly uses the Style-LInguistics Mismatch (SLIM) in fake speech to separate them from real speech. SLIM first employs self-supervised pretraining on only real samples to learn the style-linguistics dependency in the real class. The learned features are then used in complement with standard pretrained acoustic features (e.g., Wav2vec) to learn a classifier on the real and fake classes. When the feature encoders are frozen, SLIM outperforms benchmark methods on out-of-domain datasets while achieving competitive results on in-domain data. The features learned by SLIM allow us to quantify the (mis)match between style and linguistic content in a sample, hence facilitating an explanation of the model decision. Surya Koppisetti, Trang Tran 0008, Gaurav Bharaj |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Towards Attention-based Contrastive Learning for Audio Spoof DetectionabstractVision transformers (ViT) have made substantial progress for classification tasks in computer vision. Recently, Gong et. al. '21, introduced attention-based modeling for several audio tasks. However, relatively unexplored is the use of a ViT for audio spoof detection task. We bridge this gap and introduce ViTs for this task. A vanilla baseline built on fine-tuning the SSAST (Gong et. al. '22) audio ViT model achieves sub-optimal equal error rates (EERs). To improve performance, we propose a novel attention-based contrastive learning framework (SSAST-CL) that uses cross-attention to aid the representation learning. Experiments show that our framework successfully disentangles the bonafide and spoof classes and helps learn better classifiers for the task. With appropriate data augmentations policy, a model trained on our framework achieves competitive performance on the ASVSpoof 2021 challenge. We provide comparisons and ablation studies to justify our claim. Chirag Goel, Surya Koppisetti, Ben Colman, Ali Shahriyari, Gaurav Bharaj |
INTERSPEECH | 2 |