VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Connor Mooney
dblp:378/1076
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 33% Learning theory · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Global Well-posedness and Convergence Analysis of Score-based Generative Models via Sharp Lipschitz Estimates · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Global Well-posedness and Convergence Analysis of Score-based Generative Models via Sharp Lipschitz Estimates · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
well-posedness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Global Well-posedness and Convergence Analysis of Score-based Generative Models via Sharp Lipschitz Estimates · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic differential equation · 0.9lipschitz estimate · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Global Well-posedness and Convergence Analysis of Score-based Generative Models via Sharp Lipschitz EstimatesabstractWe establish global well-posedness and convergence of the score-based generative models (SGM) under minimal general assumptions of initial data for score estimation. For the smooth case, we start from a Lipschitz bound of the score function with optimal time length. The optimality is validated by an example whose Lipschitz constant of scores is bounded at initial but blows up in finite time. This necessitates the separation of time scales in conventional bounds for non-log-concave distributions. In contrast, our follow up analysis only relies on a local Lipschitz condition and is valid globally in time. This leads to the convergence of numerical scheme without time separation. For the non-smooth case, we show that the optimal Lipschitz bound is $O(1/t)$ in the point-wise sense for distributions supported on a compact, smooth and low-dimensional manifold with boundary. Connor Mooney, Zhongjian Wang, Jack Xin |
ICLR | 1 |