Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Lars Mennen

dblp:378/1436 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-9324-4921ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 50% Program synthesis and code generation · 50%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
end-user software engineering		 0.912025
Requirements Are All You Need: The Final Frontier for End-User Software Engineering · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generative AI · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Requirements Are All You Need: The Final Frontier for End-User Software Engineering
abstract
What if end-users could own the software development lifecycle from conception to deployment using only requirements expressed in language, images, video or audio? We explore this idea, building on the capabilities that Generative AI brings to software generation and maintenance techniques. How could designing software in this way better serve end-users? What are the implications of this process for the future of end-user software engineering and the software development lifecycle? We discuss the research needed to bridge the gap between where we are today and these imagined systems of the future.
Diana Robinson, Christian Cabrera 0001, Andrew D. Gordon 0001, Neil D. Lawrence, Lars Mennen
 ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.5