Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aswin RRV

dblp:378/1523 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 77% Efficient and distributed learning · 12% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 11%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
self-reflection
0.912025
ThinkTuning: Instilling Cognitive Reflections without Distillation · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning
0.812024
Step-by-Step Reasoning to Solve Grid Puzzles: Where do LLMs Falter? · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.312025
ThinkTuning: Instilling Cognitive Reflections without Distillation · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning
0.212024
Step-by-Step Reasoning to Solve Grid Puzzles: Where do LLMs Falter? · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

teacher-student training · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9GRPO · 0.9step-by-step reasoning evaluation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ThinkTuning: Instilling Cognitive Reflections without Distillation
abstract
Recent advances in test-time scaling have led to the emergence of thinking LLMs that exhibit self-reflective behaviors and multi-step reasoning.While RL drives this self-improvement paradigm, a recent study (Gandhi et al., 2025) shows that RL alone does not truly instill these new reasoning abilities -it merely draws out behaviors already present in the base models.This raises a question: How can we train models that don't exhibit such thinking behavior to develop it in the first place?To this end, we propose THINKTUNING, a GRPO-based interactive training approach where we augment the rollouts of a student model with the guidance from a teacher model.A simple idea from classroom practice inspires our method: a teacher poses a problem, lets the student try an answer, then gives corrective feedback-enough to point the mind in the right direction and then show the solution.Each piece of feedback reshapes the student's thoughts, leading them to arrive at the correct solution.Similarly, we find that this type of implicit supervision through feedback from a teacher model of the same size improves the reasoning capabilities of the student model.In particular, on average, our method shows a 3.85% improvement over zero-shot baselines across benchmarks, and on MATH-500, AIME and GPQA-Diamond it shows 2.08%, 2.23% and 3.99% improvements over the vanilla-GRPO baseline 1 .
Aswin RRV, Jacob Dineen, Divij Handa, Md Nayem Uddin, Mihir Parmar, Chitta Baral, Ben Zhou
EMNLP1
2025 ToW: Thoughts of Words Improve Reasoning in Large Language Models
abstract
Zhikun Xu, Ming Shen, Jacob Dineen, Zhaonan Li, Xiao Ye, Shijie Lu, Aswin Rrv, Chitta Baral, Ben Zhou. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Zhikun Xu, Ming Shen 0006, Jacob Dineen, Shijie Lu, Aswin RRV, Chitta Baral, Ben Zhou
NAACL (Long Papers)7
2024 Step-by-Step Reasoning to Solve Grid Puzzles: Where do LLMs Falter?
abstract
Nemika Tyagi, Mihir Parmar, Mohith Kulkarni, Aswin Rrv, Nisarg Patel, Mutsumi Nakamura, Arindam Mitra, Chitta Baral. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Nemika Tyagi, Mihir Parmar, Mohith Kulkarni, Aswin RRV, Nisarg Patel, Mutsumi Nakamura, Arindam Mitra, Chitta Baral
EMNLP4