VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Potaptchik
dblp:378/2045
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Generative modeling · 51% Optimization for machine learning · 23% Learning theory · 16% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
2.5 | 3 | 2025 | Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025 Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis · COLT 2025 Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
manifold hypothesis |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025 Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
intrinsic dimension |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
schrödinger bridge |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Tree-Structured Costs and Entropic Wasserstein Barycentres · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
wasserstein barycenter |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Tree-Structured Costs and Entropic Wasserstein Barycentres · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
conditional flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › sensor-based navigation
LiDAR-based navigation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score matching · 1.7optimal transport · 0.9log-domain smoothing · 0.9iterative proportional fitting · 0.9iterative markovian fitting · 0.9backward SDE · 0.9KL divergence analysis · 0.9riemannian geometry · 0.8geodesic interpolation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold HypothesisabstractScore-matching generative models have proven successful at sampling from complex high-dimensional data distributions. In many applications, this distribution is believed to concentrate on a much lower $d$-dimensional manifold embedded into $D$-dimensional space; this is known as the manifold hypothesis. The current best-known convergence guarantees are either linear in $D$ or polynomial (superlinear) in $d$. The latter exploits a novel integration scheme for the backward SDE. We take the best of both worlds and show that the number of steps diffusion models require in order to converge in Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence is linear (up to logarithmic terms) in the intrinsic dimension $d$. Moreover, we show that this linear dependency is sharp. Peter Potaptchik, Iskander Azangulov, George Deligiannidis |
COLT | 1 |
| 2025 | Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry AdaptiveabstractDiffusion models have achieved state-of-the-art performance, demonstrating remarkable generalisation capabilities across diverse domains. However, the mechanisms underpinning these strong capabilities remain only partially understood. A leading conjecture, based on the manifold hypothesis, attributes this success to their ability to adapt to low-dimensional geometric structure within the data. This work provides evidence for this conjecture, focusing on how such phenomena could result from the formulation of the learning problem through score matching. We inspect the role of implicit regularisation by investigating the effect of smoothing minimisers of the empirical score matching objective. Our theoretical and empirical results confirm that smoothing the score function—or equivalently, smoothing in the log-density domain—produces smoothing tangential to the data manifold. In addition, we show that the manifold along which the diffusion model generalises can be controlled by choosing an appropriate smoothing. Tyler Farghly, Peter Potaptchik, Samuel Howard, George Deligiannidis, Jakiw Pidstrigach |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Tree-Structured Costs and Entropic Wasserstein BarycentresabstractRecent advances in flow-based generative modelling have provided scalable methods for computing the Schrödinger Bridge (SB) between distributions, a dynamic form of entropy-regularised Optimal Transport (OT) for the quadratic cost. The successful Iterative Markovian Fitting (IMF) procedure solves the SB problem via sequential bridge-matching steps, presenting an elegant and practical approach with many favourable properties over the more traditional Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF) procedure. Beyond the standard setting, optimal transport can be generalised to the multi-marginal case in which the objective is to minimise a cost defined over several marginal distributions. Of particular importance are costs defined over a tree structure, from which Wasserstein barycentres can be recovered as a special case. In this work, we extend the IMF procedure to solve for the tree-structured SB problem. Our resulting algorithm inherits the many advantages of IMF over IPF approaches in the tree-based setting. In the case of Wasserstein barycentres, our approach can be viewed as extending the widely used fixed-point approach to use flow-based entropic OT solvers, while requiring only simple bridge-matching steps at each iteration. Samuel Howard, Peter Potaptchik, George Deligiannidis |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data ManifoldabstractMatching objectives underpin the success of modern generative models and rely on constructing conditional paths that transform a source distribution into a target distribution. Despite being a fundamental building block, conditional paths have been designed principally under the assumption of $\textit{Euclidean geometry}$, resulting in straight interpolations. However, this can be particularly restrictive for tasks such as trajectory inference, where straight paths might lie outside the data manifold, thus failing to capture the underlying dynamics giving rise to the observed marginals. In this paper, we propose Metric Flow Matching (MFM), a novel simulation-free framework for conditional flow matching where interpolants are approximate geodesics learned by minimizing the kinetic energy of a data-induced Riemannian metric. This way, the generative model matches vector fields on the data manifold, which corresponds to lower uncertainty and more meaningful interpolations. We prescribe general metrics to instantiate MFM, independent of the task, and test it on a suite of challenging problems including LiDAR navigation, unpaired image translation, and modeling cellular dynamics. We observe that MFM outperforms the Euclidean baselines, particularly achieving SOTA on single-cell trajectory prediction. Kacper Kapusniak, Peter Potaptchik, Teodora Reu, Leo Zhang, Alexander Tong 0001, Michael M. Bronstein, Joey Bose, Francesco Di Giovanni |
NeurIPS | 2 |