Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Runsong Jia
dblp:378/2104
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-3986-2679ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 43% Graph learning · 38% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
dynamic graph learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Graph Retention Networks for Dynamic Graphs · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
dynamic graph neural network |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Graph Retention Networks for Dynamic Graphs · WWW 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › retrieval-augmented generation
graph-based RAG |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Agent-Enhanced Heterogeneous Graph RAG for Academic Question Answering · WWW 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Agent-Enhanced Heterogeneous Graph RAG for Academic Question Answering · WWW 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sufficiency-aware reranking · 2.0graph-grounded verification · 2.0agentic retrieval · 2.0retention · 1.0chunkwise training · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Graph Retention Networks for Dynamic GraphsabstractIn this paper, we propose Graph Retention Networks (GRNs) as a unified architecture for deep learning on dynamic graphs. The GRN extends the concept of retention into dynamic graph data as graph retention, equipping the model with three key computational paradigms: parallelizable training, low-cost $\mathcal{O}(1)$ inference, and long-term chunkwise training. This architecture achieves an optimal balance between efficiency, effectiveness, and scalability. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate its strong performance in both edge-level prediction and node-level classification tasks with significantly reduced training latency, lower GPU memory overhead, and improved inference throughput by up to 86.7x compared to SOTA baselines. The proposed GRN architecture achieves competitive performance across diverse dynamic graph benchmarks, demonstrating its adaptability to a wide range of tasks. Qian Chang, Xia Li 0010, Xiufeng Cheng, Runsong Jia, Jinqing Yang, Ciprian Doru Giurcaneanu |
WWW | 4 |
| 2026 | Agent-Enhanced Heterogeneous Graph RAG for Academic Question AnsweringabstractAcademic question answering requires reasoning over heterogeneous scholarly graphs, where queries range from simple attribute lookups to multi-hop inference across author--paper--venue structures. Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems struggle in this setting due to three limitations: (1) fixed retrieval strategies that do not adapt to varying query complexity, (2) the absence of sufficiency evaluation leading to incomplete or misaligned evidence, and (3) a lack of structured verification against graph facts. To address these issues, we propose an agentic heterogeneous graph RAG method that transforms the three core stages of the RAG pipeline into explicit agentic decision steps. A query-aware retrieval agent analyzes query type and selects an appropriate graph traversal strategy; a sufficiency-aware reranking agent assesses evidence completeness and adaptively expands the retrieved subgraph; and a graph-grounded verification agent checks entity, relation, and attribute correctness before finalizing the answer. Experiments on heterogeneous graphs constructed from OpenAlex and DBLP suggest that our method consistently outperforms strong LLM, graph-augmented RAG, and agent-based baselines. Runsong Jia, Mengjia Wu, Ying Ding 0001, Jie Lu 0001, Yi Zhang 0095 |
WWW | 1 |