Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dana Grund

dblp:378/2134 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation
0.812024
FUSE: Fast Unified Simulation and Estimation for PDEs · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
simulation-based inference
0.812024
FUSE: Fast Unified Simulation and Estimation for PDEs · NeurIPS 2024
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
operator learning
0.812024
FUSE: Fast Unified Simulation and Estimation for PDEs · NeurIPS 2024
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equations
PDE surrogate modeling
0.812024
FUSE: Fast Unified Simulation and Estimation for PDEs · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation-based inference · 1.5operator learning · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 FUSE: Fast Unified Simulation and Estimation for PDEs
abstract
The joint prediction of continuous fields and statistical estimation of the underlying discrete parameters is a common problem for many physical systems, governed by PDEs. Hitherto, it has been separately addressed by employing operator learning surrogates for field prediction while using simulation-based inference (and its variants) for statistical parameter determination. Here, we argue that solving both problems within the same framework can lead to consistent gains in accuracy and robustness. To this end, we propose a novel and flexible formulation of the operator learning problem that jointly predicts continuous quantities and infers distributions of discrete parameters, thereby amortizing the cost of both the inverse and the surrogate models to a joint pre-training step. We present the capabilities of the proposed methodology for predicting continuous and discrete biomarkers in full-body haemodynamics simulations under different levels of missing information. We also consider a test case for atmospheric large-eddy simulation of a two-dimensional dry cold bubble, where we infer both continuous time-series and information about the system's conditions. We present comparisons against different baselines to showcase significantly increased accuracy in both the inverse and the surrogate tasks.
Levi E. Lingsch, Dana Grund, Siddhartha Mishra, Georgios Kissas
NeurIPS2