Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wanghui Qiu

dblp:378/3033 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-1896-6913ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 67% Information retrieval · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.912025
TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methods · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark
0.912025
TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methods · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Data mining › anomaly detection
time series anomaly detection
0.912025
TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methods · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.312025
TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methods · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7deep learning · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Land Deformation Prediction via Multi-modal Adaptive Association Learning
abstract
Accurate land deformation prediction using InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar) technology is crucial for early warning of geological disasters. However, existing prediction methods face two major challenges: cross-area association bottleneck and inadequate handling of temporal distribution heterogeneity. To address these challenges, we propose Multi-modal Adaptive Association Learning framework (MAAL). For the spatial knowledge transfer challenge, we introduce a cross-area multi-modal association learning module that integrates multi-modal (InSAR and geological text) data to enable knowledge transfer between areas with similar geological characteristics. For temporal distribution heterogeneity, we develop an adaptive evolution stage recognition module that uses distribution routers to identify different temporal patterns, then applies corresponding linear extractors to model the heterogeneous landslide evolution. Experimental validation on 889 hazardous areas demonstrates that MAAL outperforms baselines.
Wanghui Qiu, Shiyan Hu 0004, Chenjuan Guo, Wenbing Shi, Ming Gao 0001, Aoying Zhou, Bin Yang 0002
CIKM1
2025 TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methods
abstract
Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) plays an important role in many domains such as finance, transportation, and healthcare. With the ongoing instrumentation of reality, more time series data will be available, leading also to growing demands for TSAD. While many TSAD methods already exist, new and better methods are still desirable. However, effective progress hinges on the availability of reliable means of evaluating new methods and comparing them with existing methods. We address deficiencies in current evaluation procedures related to datasets and experimental settings and protocols. Specifically, we propose a new time series anomaly detection benchmark, called TAB. First, TAB encompasses 29 public multivariate datasets and 1,635 univariate time series from different domains to facilitate more comprehensive evaluations on diverse datasets. Second, TAB covers a variety of TSAD methods, including Non-learning, Machine learning, Deep learning, LLM-based, and Time-series pre-trained methods. Third, TAB features a unified and automated evaluation pipeline that enables fair and easy evaluation of TSAD methods. Finally, we employ TAB to evaluate existing TSAD methods and report on the outcomes, thereby offering a deeper insight into the performance of these methods.
Xiangfei Qiu, Zhe Li 0011, Wanghui Qiu, Shiyan Hu 0004, Lekui Zhou, Xingjian Wu, Chenjuan Guo, Aoying Zhou, Zhenli Sheng, Jilin Hu, Christian S. Jensen, Bin Yang 0002
Proc. VLDB Endow.3