Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Teodor-George Marchitan

dblp:378/5663 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities
historical linguistics
0.812024
Verba volant, scripta volant? Don't worry! There are computational solutions for protoword reconstruction · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence modeling · 0.8computational historical linguistics · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Benchmarking Large Language Models for Biomedical Relation Extraction
abstract
Extracting SNP-phenotype associations from biomedical literature is vital but challenging. We benchmarked diverse NLP models, including MLMs, hybrid architectures, and state-of-the-art LLMs (Gemini 2.0, OpenAI O-series, Qwen, Mistral), on the SNPPhenA corpus across three tasks: sentence-level, abstract-level, and association strength classification. OpenAI O1 achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) results using few-shot learning for non-finetuned sentence-level classification (F1 0.89) and established a new SOTA for abstract-level classification (F1 0.82). Association strength classification proved difficult, though fine-tuned Gemini 2.0 Pro performed best (F1 0.60) in the first LLM evaluation of this task. Proprietary LLMs, especially in few-shot (O1) or fine-tuned (Gemini 2.0 Pro) settings, significantly outperformed other models. These findings confrm the power of modern LLMs for genomic knowledge extraction.
Claudiu Creanga, Teodor-George Marchitan, Liviu P. Dinu
KES2
2024 Verba volant, scripta volant? Don't worry! There are computational solutions for protoword reconstruction
abstract
Liviu P Dinu, Ana Sabina Uban, Alina Maria Cristea, Ioan-Bogdan Iordache, Teodor-George Marchitan, Simona Georgescu, Laurentiu Zoicas. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Liviu P. Dinu, Ana Sabina Uban, Alina Maria Cristea, Ioan-Bogdan Iordache, Teodor-George Marchitan, Simona Georgescu, Laurentiu Zoicas
EMNLP5