Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Teodor-George Marchitan
dblp:378/5663
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities
historical linguistics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Verba volant, scripta volant? Don't worry! There are computational solutions for protoword reconstruction · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequence modeling · 0.8computational historical linguistics · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Benchmarking Large Language Models for Biomedical Relation ExtractionabstractExtracting SNP-phenotype associations from biomedical literature is vital but challenging. We benchmarked diverse NLP models, including MLMs, hybrid architectures, and state-of-the-art LLMs (Gemini 2.0, OpenAI O-series, Qwen, Mistral), on the SNPPhenA corpus across three tasks: sentence-level, abstract-level, and association strength classification. OpenAI O1 achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) results using few-shot learning for non-finetuned sentence-level classification (F1 0.89) and established a new SOTA for abstract-level classification (F1 0.82). Association strength classification proved difficult, though fine-tuned Gemini 2.0 Pro performed best (F1 0.60) in the first LLM evaluation of this task. Proprietary LLMs, especially in few-shot (O1) or fine-tuned (Gemini 2.0 Pro) settings, significantly outperformed other models. These findings confrm the power of modern LLMs for genomic knowledge extraction. Claudiu Creanga, Teodor-George Marchitan, Liviu P. Dinu |
KES | 2 |
| 2024 | Verba volant, scripta volant? Don't worry! There are computational solutions for protoword reconstructionabstractLiviu P Dinu, Ana Sabina Uban, Alina Maria Cristea, Ioan-Bogdan Iordache, Teodor-George Marchitan, Simona Georgescu, Laurentiu Zoicas. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024. Liviu P. Dinu, Ana Sabina Uban, Alina Maria Cristea, Ioan-Bogdan Iordache, Teodor-George Marchitan, Simona Georgescu, Laurentiu Zoicas |
EMNLP | 5 |