Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emanuele Loffredo

dblp:378/6639 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 67% Learning paradigms · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance
0.812024
Restoring balance: principled under/oversampling of data for optimal classification · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization theory
0.812024
Restoring balance: principled under/oversampling of data for optimal classification · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
resampling
0.812024
Restoring balance: principled under/oversampling of data for optimal classification · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.8high-dimensional asymptotics · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Restoring balance: principled under/oversampling of data for optimal classification
abstract
Class imbalance in real-world data poses a common bottleneck for machine learning tasks, since achieving good generalization on under-represented examples is often challenging. Mitigation strategies, such as under or oversampling the data depending on their abundances, are routinely proposed and tested empirically, but how they should adapt to the data statistics remains poorly understood. In this work, we determine exact analytical expressions of the generalization curves in the high-dimensional regime for linear classifiers (Support Vector Machines). We also provide a sharp prediction of the effects of under/oversampling strategies depending on class imbalance, first and second moments of the data, and the metrics of performance considered. We show that mixed strategies involving under and oversampling of data lead to performance improvement. Through numerical experiments, we show the relevance of our theoretical predictions on real datasets, on deeper architectures and with sampling strategies based on unsupervised probabilistic models.
Emanuele Loffredo, Mauro Pastore, Simona Cocco, Rémi Monasson
ICML1