Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samar Fares

dblp:379/3783 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
contribution evaluation
0.812024
Redefining Contributions: Shapley-Driven Federated Learning · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.812024
Redefining Contributions: Shapley-Driven Federated Learning · IJCAI 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › cooperative game theory › solution concepts
shapley value
0.812024
Redefining Contributions: Shapley-Driven Federated Learning · IJCAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

shapley value · 1.5sensitivity metric · 0.8adversarial attack transfer · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Fusion of drones tracking using different LSTM approaches and a CMA-EA knowledge base approach
Raed Abu Zitar, Samar Fares, Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni, Frédéric Barbaresco
Neural Comput. Appl.2
2024 Attack To Defend: Exploiting Adversarial Attacks for Detecting Poisoned Models
abstract
Poisoning (trojan/backdoor) attacks enable an adversary to train and deploy a corrupted machine learning (ML) model, which typically works well and achieves good ac-curacy on clean input samples but behaves maliciously on poisoned samples containing specific trigger patterns. Using such poisoned ML models as the foundation to build real-world systems can compromise application safety. Hence, there is a critical need for algorithms that detect whether a given target model has been poisoned. This work proposes a novel approach for detecting poisoned models called Attack To Defend (A2D), which is based on the observation that poisoned models are more sensitive to adversarial pertur-bations compared to benign models. We propose a metric called sensitivity to adversarial perturbations (SAP) to mea-sure the sensitivity of a ML model to adversarial attacks at a specific perturbation bound. We then generate strong ad-versarial attacks against an unrelated reference model and estimate the SAP value of the target model by transferring the generated attacks. The target model is deemed to be a trojan if its SAP value exceeds a decision threshold. The A2D framework requires only black-box access to the target model and a small clean set, while being computationally efficient. The A2D approach has been evaluated on four standard image datasets and its effectiveness under various types of poisoning attacks has been demonstrated.
Samar Fares, Karthik Nandakumar
CVPR1
2024 Redefining Contributions: Shapley-Driven Federated Learning
Nurbek Tastan, Samar Fares, Toluwani Aremu, Samuel Horváth, Karthik Nandakumar
IJCAI2