Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ben Shaw 0003
dblp:379/5884
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 77% Learning theory · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape analysis › symmetry analysis
symmetry detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Symmetry Discovery Beyond Affine Transformations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
manifold hypothesis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Symmetry Discovery Beyond Affine Transformations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
LieGAN · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Label-Guided Imputation via Forest-Based Proximities for Improved Time Series ClassificationabstractMissing data is a common problem in time series data. Most methods for imputation ignore label information pertaining to the time series even if that information exists. In this paper, we provide a framework for missing data imputation in the context of time series classification, where each time series is associated with a categorical label. We define a means of imputing missing values conditional upon labels, the method being guided by powerful, existing supervised models designed for high accuracy in this task. From each model, we extract a tree-based proximity measure from which imputation can be applied. We show that imputation using this method generally provides richer information leading to higher classification accuracies, despite the imputed values differing from the true values. Jake S. Rhodes, Adam G. Rustad, Sofia Pelagalli Maia, Evan Thacker, Hyunmi Choi, Jose Gutierrez, Tatjana Rundek, Ben Shaw 0003 |
ICMLA | 8 |
| 2024 | Symmetry Discovery Beyond Affine TransformationsabstractSymmetry detection has been shown to improve various machine learning tasks. In the context of continuous symmetry detection, current state of the art experiments are limited to the detection of affine transformations. Under the manifold assumption, we outline a framework for discovering continuous symmetry in data beyond the affine transformation group. We also provide a similar framework for discovering discrete symmetry. We experimentally compare our method to an existing method known as LieGAN and show that our method is competitive at detecting affine symmetries for large sample sizes and superior than LieGAN for small sample sizes. We also show our method is able to detect continuous symmetries beyond the affine group and is generally more computationally efficient than LieGAN. Ben Shaw 0003, Abram Magner, Kevin R. Moon |
NeurIPS | 1 |