Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shengjie Ren
dblp:379/5975
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-4626-1575ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 94% Algorithms and data structures · 6% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization › evolutionary algorithm
evolutionary multi-objective optimization |
2.6 | 3 | 2026 | Not Just for Archiving: Provable Benefits of Reusing the Archive in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization · AAAI 2026 A Theoretical Perspective on Why Stochastic Population Update Needs an Archive in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization · IJCAI 2025 An Archive Can Bring Provable Speed-ups in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms · IJCAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Not Just for Archiving: Provable Benefits of Reusing the Archive in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization · AAAI 2026 |
Algorithms and data structures
runtime analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | A Theoretical Perspective on Why Stochastic Population Update Needs an Archive in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization · IJCAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
runtime analysis · 1.0SMS-EMOA · 1.0evolutionary algorithm · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Not Just for Archiving: Provable Benefits of Reusing the Archive in Evolutionary Multi-objective OptimizationabstractEvolutionary Algorithms (EAs) have become the most popular tool for solving widely-existed multi-objective optimization problems. In Multi-Objective EAs (MOEAs), there is increasing interest in using an archive to store non-dominated solutions generated during the search. This approach can 1) mitigate the effects of population oscillation, a common issue in many MOEAs, and 2) allow for the use of smaller, more practical population sizes. In this paper, we analytically show that the archive can even further help MOEAs through reusing its solutions during the process of new solution generation. We first prove that using a small population size alongside an archive (without incorporating archived solutions in the generation process) may fail on certain problems, as the population may remove previously discovered but promising solutions. We then prove that reusing archive solutions can overcome this limitation, resulting in at least a polynomial speedup on the expected running time. Our analysis focuses on the well-established SMS-EMOA algorithm applied to the commonly studied OneJumpZeroJump problem as well as one of its variants. We also show that reusing archive solutions can be better than using a large population size directly. Finally, we validate our theoretical findings through experiments on well-known practical optimization problems. Shengjie Ren, Zimin Liang, Miqing Li, Chao Qian 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | A Theoretical Perspective on Why Stochastic Population Update Needs an Archive in Evolutionary Multi-objective OptimizationabstractEvolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been widely applied to multi-objective optimization due to their population-based nature. Population update, a key component in multi-objective EAs (MOEAs), is usually performed in a greedy, deterministic manner. However, recent studies have questioned this practice and shown that stochastic population update (SPU), which allows inferior solutions have a chance to be preserved, can help MOEAs jump out of local optima more easily. Nevertheless, SPU risks losing high-quality solutions, potentially requiring a large population. Intuitively, a possible solution to this issue is to introduce an archive that stores the best solutions ever found. In this paper, we theoretically show that using an archive allows a small population and may enhance the search performance of SPU-based MOEAs. We examine two classic algorithms, SMS-EMOA and NSGA-II, on the bi-objective problem OneJumpZeroJump, and prove that using an archive can reduce the expected running time upper bound (even exponentially). The comparison between SMS-EMOA and NSGA-II also suggests that the (μ+μ) update mode may be more suitable for SPU than the (μ+1) update mode. We also validate our findings empirically. We hope this work may provide theoretical support to explore different ideas of designing algorithms in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Shengjie Ren, Zimin Liang, Miqing Li, Chao Qian 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2024 | An Archive Can Bring Provable Speed-ups in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms
Chao Bian 0002, Shengjie Ren, Miqing Li, Chao Qian 0001 |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2024 | Maintaining Diversity Provably Helps in Evolutionary Multimodal Optimization
Shengjie Ren, Zhijia Qiu, Chao Bian 0002, Miqing Li, Chao Qian 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2024 | A First Running Time Analysis of the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2)
Shengjie Ren, Chao Bian 0002, Miqing Li, Chao Qian 0001 |
PPSN (3) | 1 |