Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Quentin Chu

dblp:379/6711 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
embedding space
0.912025
Mixed-curvature decision trees and random forests · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
product manifold
0.912025
Mixed-curvature decision trees and random forests · ICML 2025
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.912025
Mixed-curvature decision trees and random forests · ICML 2025
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
decision tree learning
0.912025
Mixed-curvature decision trees and random forests · ICML 2025
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › ensemble learning
random forest
0.912025
Mixed-curvature decision trees and random forests · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
hallucination
0.812024
Estimating the Hallucination Rate of Generative AI · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian prediction
posterior predictive distribution
0.812024
Estimating the Hallucination Rate of Generative AI · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.212024
Estimating the Hallucination Rate of Generative AI · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hyperspherical geometry · 1.7hyperbolic geometry · 1.7log probability evaluation · 0.8bayesian inference · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Mixed-curvature decision trees and random forests
abstract
Decision trees (DTs) and their random forest (RF) extensions are workhorses of classification and regression in Euclidean spaces. However, algorithms for learning in non-Euclidean spaces are still limited. We extend DT and RF algorithms to product manifolds: Cartesian products of several hyperbolic, hyperspherical, or Euclidean components. Such manifolds handle heterogeneous curvature while still factorizing neatly into simpler components, making them compelling embedding spaces for complex datasets. Our novel angular reformulation respects manifold geometry while preserving the algorithmic properties that make decision trees effective. In the special cases of single-component manifolds, our method simplifies to its Euclidean or hyperbolic counterparts, or introduces hyperspherical DT algorithms, depending on the curvature. In benchmarks on a diverse suite of 57 classification, regression, and link prediction tasks, our product RFs ranked first on 29 tasks and came in the top 2 for 41. This highlights the value of product RFs as straightforward yet powerful new tools for data analysis in product manifolds. Code for our method is available at https://github.com/pchlenski/manify.
Philippe Chlenski, Quentin Chu, Raiyan R. Khan, Kaizhu Du, Antonio Khalil Moretti, Itsik Pe'er
ICML2
2024 Estimating the Hallucination Rate of Generative AI
abstract
This paper presents a method for estimating the hallucination rate for in-context learning (ICL) with generative AI. In ICL, a conditional generative model (CGM) is prompted with a dataset and a prediction question and asked to generate a response. One interpretation of ICL assumes that the CGM computes the posterior predictive of an unknown Bayesian model, which implicitly defines a joint distribution over observable datasets and latent mechanisms. This joint distribution factorizes into two components: the model prior over mechanisms and the model likelihood of datasets given a mechanism. With this perspective, we define a \textit{hallucination} as a generated response to the prediction question with low model likelihood given the mechanism. We develop a new method that takes an ICL problem and estimates the probability that a CGM will generate a hallucination. Our method only requires generating prediction questions and responses from the CGM and evaluating its response log probability. We empirically evaluate our method using large language models for synthetic regression and natural language ICL tasks.
Andrew Jesson, Nicolas Beltran-Velez, Quentin Chu, Sweta Karlekar, Jannik Kossen, Yarin Gal, John P. Cunningham, David M. Blei
NeurIPS3