Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John M. Conroy

dblp:38/1285 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
17ranked-venue papers
7as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
evaluation
1.012026
Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › evaluation › text generation evaluation
report generation evaluation
1.012026
Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › evaluation › text generation evaluation
retrieval-augmented generation evaluation
1.012026
Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval
question answering
0.312026
Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.232011
Ranking Human and Machine Summarization Systems · EMNLP 2011
Topic-Focused Multi-Document Summarization Using an Approximate Oracle Score · ACL 2006
Text Summarization via Hidden Markov Models · SIGIR 2001
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
summarization evaluation
0.112011
Ranking Human and Machine Summarization Systems · EMNLP 2011
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
multi-document summarization
0.112006
Topic-Focused Multi-Document Summarization Using an Approximate Oracle Score · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization
0.012001
Text Summarization via Hidden Markov Models · SIGIR 2001
Memory systems
shared memory
0.011991
Characterizing memory hot spots in a shared memory MIMD machine · SC 1991
High-performance computing
fast fourier transform
0.011988
The fast fourier transform and sparse matrix computations: a study of two applications on teh HORIZON supercomputer · SC 1988
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.011988
The fast fourier transform and sparse matrix computations: a study of two applications on teh HORIZON supercomputer · SC 1988
High-performance computing › sparse linear algebra
sparse matrix computation
0.011988
The fast fourier transform and sparse matrix computations: a study of two applications on teh HORIZON supercomputer · SC 1988
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
massively parallel processor
0.011991
Characterizing memory hot spots in a shared memory MIMD machine · SC 1991
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
MIMD architecture
0.011991
Characterizing memory hot spots in a shared memory MIMD machine · SC 1991
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › instruction set architecture
instruction set design
0.011988
The fast fourier transform and sparse matrix computations: a study of two applications on teh HORIZON supercomputer · SC 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.0ARGUE framework · 1.0ranking-based evaluation · 0.1oracle score · 0.1hidden markov model · 0.0queueing analysis · 0.0pseudo-random interleaving · 0.0performance evaluation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation
abstract
Generation of citation-backed reports is a primary use case for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. While open-source evaluation tools exist for various RAG tasks, tools designed for report generation are lacking. Accordingly, we introduce Auto-ARGUE, a robust LLM-based implementation of the recently proposed ARGUE framework for report generation evaluation. We present analysis of Auto-ARGUE on the report generation pilot task from the TREC 2024 NeuCLIR track and on two tasks from the TREC 2024 RAG track, showing good system-level correlations with human judgments. Additionally, we release ARGUE-viz, a web app for visualization and fine-grained analysis of Auto-ARGUE judgments and scores1.
William Gantt Walden, Marc Mason, Orion Weller, Laura Dietz, John M. Conroy, Neil P. Molino, Hannah Recknor, Bryan Li, Gabrielle K. Liu, Dawn J. Lawrie, James Mayfield, Eugene Yang 0001
SIGIR5
2015 MultiLing 2015: Multilingual Summarization of Single and Multi-Documents, On-line Fora, and Call-center Conversations
abstract
George Giannakopoulos, Jeff Kubina, John Conroy, Josef Steinberger, Benoit Favre, Mijail Kabadjov, Udo Kruschwitz, Massimo Poesio. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 2015.
George Giannakopoulos, Jeff Kubina, John M. Conroy, Josef Steinberger, Benoît Favre, Mijail A. Kabadjov, Udo Kruschwitz, Massimo Poesio
SIGDIAL Conference3
2014 A Repository of State of the Art and Competitive Baseline Summaries for Generic News Summarization
Kai Hong, John M. Conroy, Benoît Favre, Alex Kulesza, Ani Nenkova
LREC2
2011 Ranking Human and Machine Summarization Systems
Peter A. Rankel, John M. Conroy, Eric Slud, Dianne P. O'Leary
EMNLP2
2011 Nouveau-ROUGE: A Novelty Metric for Update Summarization
abstract
An update summary should provide a fluent summarization of new information on a time-evolving topic, assuming that the reader has already reviewed older documents or summaries. In 2007 and 2008, an annual summarization evaluation included an update summarization task. Several participating systems produced update summaries indistinguishable from human-generated summaries when measured using ROUGE. However, no machine system performed near human-level performance in manual evaluations such as pyramid and overall responsiveness scoring. We present a metric called Nouveau-ROUGE that improves correlation with manual evaluation metrics and can be used to predict both the pyramid score and overall responsiveness for update summaries. Nouveau-ROUGE can serve as a less expensive surrogate for manual evaluations when comparing existing systems and when developing new ones.
John M. Conroy, Judith D. Schlesinger, Dianne P. O'Leary
Comput. Linguistics1
2008 Arabic/English Multi-document Summarization with CLASSY - The Past and the Future
Judith D. Schlesinger, Dianne P. O'Leary, John M. Conroy
CICLing3
2008 Mind the Gap: Dangers of Divorcing Evaluations of Summary Content from Linguistic Quality
John M. Conroy, Hoa Trang Dang
COLING1
2007 QCS: A system for querying, clustering and summarizing documents
Daniel M. Dunlavy, Dianne P. O'Leary, John M. Conroy, Judith D. Schlesinger
Inf. Process. Manag.3
2006 Topic-Focused Multi-Document Summarization Using an Approximate Oracle Score
John M. Conroy, Judith D. Schlesinger, Dianne P. O'Leary
ACL1
2003 QCS: A Tool for Querying, Clustering, and Summarizing Documents
Daniel M. Dunlavy, John M. Conroy, Dianne P. O'Leary
HLT-NAACL2
2001 Hidden Markov Models for Chromosome Identification
abstract
Presents a hidden Markov model for automatic karyotyping. Previously, we demonstrated that this method is robust in the presence of different types of metaphase spreads, truncation of chromosomes and minor chromosome abnormalities, and that it gives results superior to neural networks on standard data sets. In this paper, we evaluate it on a data set consisting of a mix of chromosomes obtained from blood, amniotic fluid and bone marrow specimens. The method is shown to be robust on this mixed set of data, as well as giving far superior results than those obtained by neural networks.
John M. Conroy, Robert L. Becker Jr., William Lefkowitz, Kewi L. Christopher, Rawatmal B. Surana, Timothy J. O'Leary, Dianne P. O'Leary, Tamara G. Kolda
CBMS1
2001 Text Summarization via Hidden Markov Models
abstract
A sentence extract summary of a document is a subset of the document's sentences that contains the main ideas in the document. We present an approach to generating such summaries, a hidden Markov model that judges the likelihood that each sentence should be contained in the summary. We compare the results of this method with summaries generated by humans, showing that we obtain significantly higher agreement than do earlier methods.
John M. Conroy, Dianne P. O'Leary
SIGIR1
1993 A bistability throughput phenomenon in a shared-memory MIMD machine
Raymond R. Glenn, Daniel V. Pryor, John M. Conroy, Theodore Johnson
J. Supercomput.3
1991 Characterizing memory hot spots in a shared memory MIMD machine
abstract
This paper analyzes two memory hot spot problems associated with massively parallel MIMD computers.The jirst is the memory stride problem, which is similar to stride problems found in existing supercomputers.Pseudo-random interleaving, as proposed by Norton and Melton, is the preferred solution.The second hot spot problem occurs in designs that use two separate memory accesses to lock and unlock critical sections (split transaction) and employ a jirst comeljirst serve queuing mechanism for shared memory locations.A bistabilip in throughput brought about by these conditions is analyzed and experimentally demonstrated.Simple equations are presented which predict the throughput at a critical section of code as a function of the number of applied threads.These equations also express the maximum number of threads that can safely be applied without the possibility of stalling.
Raymond R. Glenn, Daniel V. Pryor, John M. Conroy, Theodore Johnson
SC3
1990 Parallel nested dissection
John M. Conroy
Parallel Comput.1
1989 A note on the parallel Cholesky factorization of wide banded matrices
John M. Conroy
Parallel Comput.1
1988 The fast fourier transform and sparse matrix computations: a study of two applications on teh HORIZON supercomputer
abstract
As part of the Horizon project, a set of application programs is being written and their performance is being evaluated. Two of these applications, the fast Fourier transform and sparse matrix computations, are described. For both problems, efficient implementations are developed that take advantage of Horizon's unique features, including fined-grained synchronization, multiple instruction streams, and a horizontal instruction set. The results indicate that Horizon will offer very high performance, sometimes in excess of a sustained rate of one floating point operation per tick.>
David A. Carlson, John M. Conroy
SC2