Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John M. Conroy
dblp:38/1285
· DBLP profile ↗
17ranked-venue papers
7as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › text generation evaluation
report generation evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › text generation evaluation
retrieval-augmented generation evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval
question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.2 | 3 | 2011 | Ranking Human and Machine Summarization Systems · EMNLP 2011 Topic-Focused Multi-Document Summarization Using an Approximate Oracle Score · ACL 2006 Text Summarization via Hidden Markov Models · SIGIR 2001 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
summarization evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Ranking Human and Machine Summarization Systems · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
multi-document summarization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Topic-Focused Multi-Document Summarization Using an Approximate Oracle Score · ACL 2006 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Text Summarization via Hidden Markov Models · SIGIR 2001 |
Memory systems
shared memory |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Characterizing memory hot spots in a shared memory MIMD machine · SC 1991 |
High-performance computing
fast fourier transform |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | The fast fourier transform and sparse matrix computations: a study of two applications on teh HORIZON supercomputer · SC 1988 |
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | The fast fourier transform and sparse matrix computations: a study of two applications on teh HORIZON supercomputer · SC 1988 |
High-performance computing › sparse linear algebra
sparse matrix computation |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | The fast fourier transform and sparse matrix computations: a study of two applications on teh HORIZON supercomputer · SC 1988 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
massively parallel processor |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Characterizing memory hot spots in a shared memory MIMD machine · SC 1991 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
MIMD architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Characterizing memory hot spots in a shared memory MIMD machine · SC 1991 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › instruction set architecture
instruction set design |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | The fast fourier transform and sparse matrix computations: a study of two applications on teh HORIZON supercomputer · SC 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.0ARGUE framework · 1.0ranking-based evaluation · 0.1oracle score · 0.1hidden markov model · 0.0queueing analysis · 0.0pseudo-random interleaving · 0.0performance evaluation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation EvaluationabstractGeneration of citation-backed reports is a primary use case for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. While open-source evaluation tools exist for various RAG tasks, tools designed for report generation are lacking. Accordingly, we introduce Auto-ARGUE, a robust LLM-based implementation of the recently proposed ARGUE framework for report generation evaluation. We present analysis of Auto-ARGUE on the report generation pilot task from the TREC 2024 NeuCLIR track and on two tasks from the TREC 2024 RAG track, showing good system-level correlations with human judgments. Additionally, we release ARGUE-viz, a web app for visualization and fine-grained analysis of Auto-ARGUE judgments and scores1. William Gantt Walden, Marc Mason, Orion Weller, Laura Dietz, John M. Conroy, Neil P. Molino, Hannah Recknor, Bryan Li, Gabrielle K. Liu, Dawn J. Lawrie, James Mayfield, Eugene Yang 0001 |
SIGIR | 5 |
| 2015 | MultiLing 2015: Multilingual Summarization of Single and Multi-Documents, On-line Fora, and Call-center ConversationsabstractGeorge Giannakopoulos, Jeff Kubina, John Conroy, Josef Steinberger, Benoit Favre, Mijail Kabadjov, Udo Kruschwitz, Massimo Poesio. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 2015. George Giannakopoulos, Jeff Kubina, John M. Conroy, Josef Steinberger, Benoît Favre, Mijail A. Kabadjov, Udo Kruschwitz, Massimo Poesio |
SIGDIAL Conference | 3 |
| 2014 | A Repository of State of the Art and Competitive Baseline Summaries for Generic News Summarization
Kai Hong, John M. Conroy, Benoît Favre, Alex Kulesza, Ani Nenkova |
LREC | 2 |
| 2011 | Ranking Human and Machine Summarization Systems
Peter A. Rankel, John M. Conroy, Eric Slud, Dianne P. O'Leary |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2011 | Nouveau-ROUGE: A Novelty Metric for Update SummarizationabstractAn update summary should provide a fluent summarization of new information on a time-evolving topic, assuming that the reader has already reviewed older documents or summaries. In 2007 and 2008, an annual summarization evaluation included an update summarization task. Several participating systems produced update summaries indistinguishable from human-generated summaries when measured using ROUGE. However, no machine system performed near human-level performance in manual evaluations such as pyramid and overall responsiveness scoring. We present a metric called Nouveau-ROUGE that improves correlation with manual evaluation metrics and can be used to predict both the pyramid score and overall responsiveness for update summaries. Nouveau-ROUGE can serve as a less expensive surrogate for manual evaluations when comparing existing systems and when developing new ones. John M. Conroy, Judith D. Schlesinger, Dianne P. O'Leary |
Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2008 | Arabic/English Multi-document Summarization with CLASSY - The Past and the Future
Judith D. Schlesinger, Dianne P. O'Leary, John M. Conroy |
CICLing | 3 |
| 2008 | Mind the Gap: Dangers of Divorcing Evaluations of Summary Content from Linguistic Quality
John M. Conroy, Hoa Trang Dang |
COLING | 1 |
| 2007 | QCS: A system for querying, clustering and summarizing documents
Daniel M. Dunlavy, Dianne P. O'Leary, John M. Conroy, Judith D. Schlesinger |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 3 |
| 2006 | Topic-Focused Multi-Document Summarization Using an Approximate Oracle Score
John M. Conroy, Judith D. Schlesinger, Dianne P. O'Leary |
ACL | 1 |
| 2003 | QCS: A Tool for Querying, Clustering, and Summarizing Documents
Daniel M. Dunlavy, John M. Conroy, Dianne P. O'Leary |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2001 | Hidden Markov Models for Chromosome IdentificationabstractPresents a hidden Markov model for automatic karyotyping. Previously, we demonstrated that this method is robust in the presence of different types of metaphase spreads, truncation of chromosomes and minor chromosome abnormalities, and that it gives results superior to neural networks on standard data sets. In this paper, we evaluate it on a data set consisting of a mix of chromosomes obtained from blood, amniotic fluid and bone marrow specimens. The method is shown to be robust on this mixed set of data, as well as giving far superior results than those obtained by neural networks. John M. Conroy, Robert L. Becker Jr., William Lefkowitz, Kewi L. Christopher, Rawatmal B. Surana, Timothy J. O'Leary, Dianne P. O'Leary, Tamara G. Kolda |
CBMS | 1 |
| 2001 | Text Summarization via Hidden Markov ModelsabstractA sentence extract summary of a document is a subset of the document's sentences that contains the main ideas in the document. We present an approach to generating such summaries, a hidden Markov model that judges the likelihood that each sentence should be contained in the summary. We compare the results of this method with summaries generated by humans, showing that we obtain significantly higher agreement than do earlier methods. John M. Conroy, Dianne P. O'Leary |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 1993 | A bistability throughput phenomenon in a shared-memory MIMD machine
Raymond R. Glenn, Daniel V. Pryor, John M. Conroy, Theodore Johnson |
J. Supercomput. | 3 |
| 1991 | Characterizing memory hot spots in a shared memory MIMD machineabstractThis paper analyzes two memory hot spot problems associated with massively parallel MIMD computers.The jirst is the memory stride problem, which is similar to stride problems found in existing supercomputers.Pseudo-random interleaving, as proposed by Norton and Melton, is the preferred solution.The second hot spot problem occurs in designs that use two separate memory accesses to lock and unlock critical sections (split transaction) and employ a jirst comeljirst serve queuing mechanism for shared memory locations.A bistabilip in throughput brought about by these conditions is analyzed and experimentally demonstrated.Simple equations are presented which predict the throughput at a critical section of code as a function of the number of applied threads.These equations also express the maximum number of threads that can safely be applied without the possibility of stalling. Raymond R. Glenn, Daniel V. Pryor, John M. Conroy, Theodore Johnson |
SC | 3 |
| 1990 | Parallel nested dissection
John M. Conroy |
Parallel Comput. | 1 |
| 1989 | A note on the parallel Cholesky factorization of wide banded matrices
John M. Conroy |
Parallel Comput. | 1 |
| 1988 | The fast fourier transform and sparse matrix computations: a study of two applications on teh HORIZON supercomputerabstractAs part of the Horizon project, a set of application programs is being written and their performance is being evaluated. Two of these applications, the fast Fourier transform and sparse matrix computations, are described. For both problems, efficient implementations are developed that take advantage of Horizon's unique features, including fined-grained synchronization, multiple instruction streams, and a horizontal instruction set. The results indicate that Horizon will offer very high performance, sometimes in excess of a sustained rate of one floating point operation per tick.> David A. Carlson, John M. Conroy |
SC | 2 |