Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tommi Mäkeläinen

dblp:38/2133 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 88% Integrated circuit design · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
system-level design
0.112007
TLM: Crossing Over From Buzz To Adoption · DAC 2007
Electronic design automation › system-level design › high-level system modeling
transaction-level modeling
0.112007
TLM: Crossing Over From Buzz To Adoption · DAC 2007
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.012007
TLM: Crossing Over From Buzz To Adoption · DAC 2007
Integrated circuit design
system-on-chip
0.012007
TLM: Crossing Over From Buzz To Adoption · DAC 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

systemc · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 TLM: Crossing Over From Buzz To Adoption
abstract
Transaction-level modeling --- originally used decades ago in the development of telecommunications network architecture --- is now widely used in SoC design. Why? Because the modern SoC is now so complex that systematic modeling and analysis are required to devise the optimal chip architecture. The architectural model is the essential platform that kick-starts two other key tasks --- verification testbench development and software development. In addition, the interoperability imperatives of SoC design and verification, IP reuse, software development, and system evaluation and integration have driven the replacement of proprietary transaction-level modeling methodologies by a TLM standard that leverages the power of SystemC. The standard --- devised by the Open SystemC Initiative (OSCI) in collaboration with the Open Core Protocol International Partnership (OCP-IP) --- covers the multiple levels of abstraction required for all of the foregoing tasks.
Francine Bacchini, Daniel Gajski, Laurent Maillet-Contoz, Haruhisa Kashiwagi, Jack Donovan, Tommi Mäkeläinen, Jack Greenbaum, Rishiyur S. Nikhil
DAC6
2006 Transaction Level Modeling in Communication Engine Design
Vesa Lahtinen, Jouni Siirtola, Tommi Mäkeläinen
FDL3
1991 Advanced design methods and tools for mobile robot development
abstract
Development of mobile robots is a very difficult and time consuming task. If good development tools were available the development work would be more productive and products would be more reliable. The authors present an efficient design approach for wheeled mobile robot development and give an overall description of tools, which are useful during the development cycle. The problem is divided into several parts: control software, at high and low level; electronics, divided into digital, analogue and power; mechanics, actuators; and sensors.>
Jari Kaikkonen, Tommi Mäkeläinen, Hannu Hakala
IROS2
1991 Interfacing functional modules within mobile robots
abstract
Designing mobile robots is a complicated task. A sophisticated mobile system has a very complex inner structure, which makes the overall architecture design hard to maintain. To partially overcome this problem the authors have implemented and tested a blackboard based data exchange architecture. Basic structure of the system is explained in this paper. Possibilities for different application areas are also presented.>
Tommi Mäkeläinen, Jari Kaikkonen, Hannu Hakala
IROS1