Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Franky Ling

dblp:38/2299 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 77% Performance modeling and evaluation · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
distributed sorting
0.011989
An Analytic/Empirical Study of Distributed Sorting on a Local Area Network · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical study · 0.0analytic modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 An Analytic/Empirical Study of Distributed Sorting on a Local Area Network
abstract
A model for distributed sorting on a local area network (LAN) is presented. This model, contrary to the conventional model, takes into account both local processing time and communication time. This model is intended to provide a framework within which the performances of various distributed sorting algorithms are analyzed and implemented on Ethernet-connected Sun workstations. The empirical results by and large agree with the predictions derivable from the model. They show that local processing, particularly sorting of local subfiles, dominates the whole process, as far as response time is concerned. All algorithms examined have similar asymptotic behavior for large files. For medium-sized files, the degree of communication parallelism has a great impact on algorithm performance.>
Wo-Shun Luk, Franky Ling
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
1988 On the Communication Cost of Distributed Database Processing
abstract
Various communication aspects of locally distributed database processing are studied, using some distributed sorting and distributed hash-based join algorithms as examples. The algorithms are implemented on diskless workstations connected by an Ethernet network to simulate a distributed main memory system environment. This experimental testbed is described. Raw communication performance data (i.e. memory-to-memory data transfer timing) are presented. The effects of the underlying distributed operating system and the speed of the processor on the communication performance are shown. Two distributed sorting algorithms are used as examples to study the issue of concurrent transmissions of messages. Distributed hash join is used as a case study for communication/local-processing tradeoff. The idea of load sharing among a number of sites to speed up the join operation is introduced.>
Franky Ling
ICDCS3