Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sangwook Cho
dblp:38/3026
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 29% Trustworthy machine learning · 29% Deep learning architectures and training · 14% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 80% Integrated circuit design · 20% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Comparing Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge Distillation · IJCAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labels · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Comparing Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge Distillation · IJCAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Comparing Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge Distillation · IJCAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
noisy label detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labels · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation dynamics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labels · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training objective |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Comparing Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge Distillation · IJCAI 2021 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A new state assignment technique for testing and low power · DAC 2004 |
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A new state assignment technique for testing and low power · DAC 2004 |
Integrated circuit design
low-power circuit design |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A new state assignment technique for testing and low power · DAC 2004 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
state assignment |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A new state assignment technique for testing and low power · DAC 2004 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
testability improvement |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A new state assignment technique for testing and low power · DAC 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-supervised learning · 0.5mean squared error · 0.5kullback-leibler divergence · 0.5eigendecomposition · 0.5data gram matrix · 0.5m-block partition · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Comparing Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge DistillationabstractKnowledge distillation (KD), transferring knowledge from a cumbersome teacher model to a lightweight student model, has been investigated to design efficient neural architectures. Generally, the objective function of KD is the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence loss between the softened probability distributions of the teacher model and the student model with the temperature scaling hyperparameter τ. Despite its widespread use, few studies have discussed how such softening influences generalization. Here, we theoretically show that the KL divergence loss focuses on the logit matching when τ increases and the label matching when τ goes to 0 and empirically show that the logit matching is positively correlated to performance improvement in general. From this observation, we consider an intuitive KD loss function, the mean squared error (MSE) between the logit vectors, so that the student model can directly learn the logit of the teacher model. The MSE loss outperforms the KL divergence loss, explained by the penultimate layer representations difference between the two losses. Furthermore, we show that sequential distillation can improve performance and that KD, using the KL divergence loss with small τ particularly, mitigates the label noise. The code to reproduce the experiments is publicly available online at https://github.com/jhoon-oh/kd_data/. Taehyeon Kim 0001, Jaehoon Oh, Nakyil Kim, Sangwook Cho, Se-Young Yun |
IJCAI | 4 |
| 2021 | FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy LabelsabstractModern deep neural networks (DNNs) become frail when the datasets contain noisy (incorrect) class labels. Robust techniques in the presence of noisy labels can be categorized into two folds: developing noise-robust functions or using noise-cleansing methods by detecting the noisy data. Recently, noise-cleansing methods have been considered as the most competitive noisy-label learning algorithms. Despite their success, their noisy label detectors are often based on heuristics more than a theory, requiring a robust classifier to predict the noisy data with loss values. In this paper, we propose a novel detector for filtering label noise. Unlike most existing methods, we focus on each data's latent representation dynamics and measure the alignment between the latent distribution and each representation using the eigen decomposition of the data gram matrix. Our framework, coined as filtering noisy instances via their eigenvectors (FINE), provides a robust detector with derivative-free simple methods having theoretical guarantees. Under our framework, we propose three applications of the FINE: sample-selection approach, semi-supervised learning approach, and collaboration with noise-robust loss functions. Experimental results show that the proposed methods consistently outperform corresponding baselines for all three applications on various benchmark datasets. Taehyeon Kim 0001, Jongwoo Ko, Sangwook Cho, Jinhwan Choi, Se-Young Yun |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2004 | A new state assignment technique for testing and low powerabstractIn order to improve the testabilities and power consumption, a new state assignment technique based on m-block partition is introduced in this paper. The length and number of feedback cycles are reduced with minimal switching activity on the state variables. Experiment shows significant improvement in power dissipation and testabilities for benchmark circuits. Sungju Park, Sangwook Cho, Seiyang Yang, Maciej J. Ciesielski |
DAC | 2 |