Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiuyao Song
dblp:38/4147
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.2 | 3 | 2009 | A LRT framework for fast spatial anomaly detection · KDD 2009 Conditional Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2007 Statistical change detection for multi-dimensional data · KDD 2007 |
Information theory › hypothesis testing
likelihood ratio test |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A LRT framework for fast spatial anomaly detection · KDD 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | A bayesian mixture model with linear regression mixing proportions · KDD 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
bayesian mixture model |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | A bayesian mixture model with linear regression mixing proportions · KDD 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | A bayesian mixture model with linear regression mixing proportions · KDD 2008 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
conditional anomaly detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Conditional Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2007 |
Data mining › time series analysis › change point detection
distribution change detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Statistical change detection for multi-dimensional data · KDD 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pruning · 0.2likelihood ratio test · 0.2linear regression mixing proportions · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1sequential hypothesis testing · 0.1monte-carlo framework · 0.1mixture model · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1density test · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | A Model-Agnostic Framework for Fast Spatial Anomaly DetectionabstractGiven a spatial dataset placed on an n × n grid, our goal is to find the rectangular regions within which subsets of the dataset exhibit anomalous behavior. We develop algorithms that, given any user-supplied arbitrary likelihood function, conduct a likelihood ratio hypothesis test (LRT) over each rectangular region in the grid, rank all of the rectangles based on the computed LRT statistics, and return the top few most interesting rectangles. To speed this process, we develop methods to prune rectangles without computing their associated LRT statistics. Mingxi Wu, Chris Jermaine, Sanjay Ranka, Xiuyao Song, John Gums |
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data | 4 |
| 2009 | A LRT framework for fast spatial anomaly detectionabstractGiven a spatial data set placed on an n x n grid, our goal is to find the rectangular regions within which subsets of the data set exhibit anomalous behavior. We develop algorithms that, given any user-supplied arbitrary likelihood function, conduct a likelihood ratio hypothesis test (LRT) over each rectangular region in the grid, rank all of the rectangles based on the computed LRT statistics, and return the top few most interesting rectangles. To speed this process, we develop methods to prune rectangles without computing their associated LRT statistics. Mingxi Wu, Xiuyao Song, Chris Jermaine, Sanjay Ranka, John Gums |
KDD | 2 |
| 2008 | A bayesian mixture model with linear regression mixing proportionsabstractClassic mixture models assume that the prevalence of the various mixture components is fixed and does not vary over time. This presents problems for applications where the goal is to learn how complex data distributions evolve. We develop models and Bayesian learning algorithms for inferring the temporal trends of the components in a mixture model as a function of time. We show the utility of our models by applying them to the real-life problem of tracking changes in the rates of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The results show that our methods can derive meaningful temporal antibiotic resistance patterns. Xiuyao Song, Chris Jermaine, Sanjay Ranka, John Gums |
KDD | 1 |
| 2007 | Statistical change detection for multi-dimensional dataabstractThis paper deals with detecting change of distribution in multi-dimensional data sets. We use sequential hypothesis testing methods from statistics to define a general, Monte-Carlo framework for solving this problem. We also define a specific statistical test for distributional change within the framework, that we call the density test. Our experimental results show that the density test has substantially more power than the two existing methods for multi-dimensional change detection. Xiuyao Song, Mingxi Wu, Chris Jermaine, Sanjay Ranka |
KDD | 1 |
| 2007 | Conditional Anomaly DetectionabstractWhen anomaly detection software is used as a data analysis tool, finding the hardest-to-detect anomalies is not the most critical task. Rather, it is often more important to make sure that those anomalies that are reported to the user are in fact interesting. If too many unremarkable data points are returned to the user labeled as candidate anomalies, the software can soon fall into disuse. One way to ensure that returned anomalies are useful is to make use of domain knowledge provided by the user. Often, the data in question includes a set of environmental attributes whose values a user would never consider to be directly indicative of an anomaly. However, such attributes cannot be ignored because they have a direct effect on the expected distribution of the result attributes whose values can indicate an anomalous observation. This paper describes a general purpose method called conditional anomaly detection for taking such differences among attributes into account, and proposes three different expectation-maximization algorithms for learning the model that is used in conditional anomaly detection. Experiments with more than 13 different data sets compare our algorithms with several other more standard methods for outlier or anomaly detection Xiuyao Song, Mingxi Wu, Chris Jermaine, Sanjay Ranka |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 1 |