Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiuyao Song

dblp:38/4147 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.232009
A LRT framework for fast spatial anomaly detection · KDD 2009
Conditional Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2007
Statistical change detection for multi-dimensional data · KDD 2007
Information theory › hypothesis testing
likelihood ratio test
0.112009
A LRT framework for fast spatial anomaly detection · KDD 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.112008
A bayesian mixture model with linear regression mixing proportions · KDD 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
bayesian mixture model
0.112008
A bayesian mixture model with linear regression mixing proportions · KDD 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model
0.112008
A bayesian mixture model with linear regression mixing proportions · KDD 2008
Data mining › anomaly detection
conditional anomaly detection
0.112007
Conditional Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2007
Data mining › time series analysis › change point detection
distribution change detection
0.112007
Statistical change detection for multi-dimensional data · KDD 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pruning · 0.2likelihood ratio test · 0.2linear regression mixing proportions · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1sequential hypothesis testing · 0.1monte-carlo framework · 0.1mixture model · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1density test · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 A Model-Agnostic Framework for Fast Spatial Anomaly Detection
abstract
Given a spatial dataset placed on an n × n grid, our goal is to find the rectangular regions within which subsets of the dataset exhibit anomalous behavior. We develop algorithms that, given any user-supplied arbitrary likelihood function, conduct a likelihood ratio hypothesis test (LRT) over each rectangular region in the grid, rank all of the rectangles based on the computed LRT statistics, and return the top few most interesting rectangles. To speed this process, we develop methods to prune rectangles without computing their associated LRT statistics.
Mingxi Wu, Chris Jermaine, Sanjay Ranka, Xiuyao Song, John Gums
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data4
2009 A LRT framework for fast spatial anomaly detection
abstract
Given a spatial data set placed on an n x n grid, our goal is to find the rectangular regions within which subsets of the data set exhibit anomalous behavior. We develop algorithms that, given any user-supplied arbitrary likelihood function, conduct a likelihood ratio hypothesis test (LRT) over each rectangular region in the grid, rank all of the rectangles based on the computed LRT statistics, and return the top few most interesting rectangles. To speed this process, we develop methods to prune rectangles without computing their associated LRT statistics.
Mingxi Wu, Xiuyao Song, Chris Jermaine, Sanjay Ranka, John Gums
KDD2
2008 A bayesian mixture model with linear regression mixing proportions
abstract
Classic mixture models assume that the prevalence of the various mixture components is fixed and does not vary over time. This presents problems for applications where the goal is to learn how complex data distributions evolve. We develop models and Bayesian learning algorithms for inferring the temporal trends of the components in a mixture model as a function of time. We show the utility of our models by applying them to the real-life problem of tracking changes in the rates of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The results show that our methods can derive meaningful temporal antibiotic resistance patterns.
Xiuyao Song, Chris Jermaine, Sanjay Ranka, John Gums
KDD1
2007 Statistical change detection for multi-dimensional data
abstract
This paper deals with detecting change of distribution in multi-dimensional data sets. We use sequential hypothesis testing methods from statistics to define a general, Monte-Carlo framework for solving this problem. We also define a specific statistical test for distributional change within the framework, that we call the density test. Our experimental results show that the density test has substantially more power than the two existing methods for multi-dimensional change detection.
Xiuyao Song, Mingxi Wu, Chris Jermaine, Sanjay Ranka
KDD1
2007 Conditional Anomaly Detection
abstract
When anomaly detection software is used as a data analysis tool, finding the hardest-to-detect anomalies is not the most critical task. Rather, it is often more important to make sure that those anomalies that are reported to the user are in fact interesting. If too many unremarkable data points are returned to the user labeled as candidate anomalies, the software can soon fall into disuse. One way to ensure that returned anomalies are useful is to make use of domain knowledge provided by the user. Often, the data in question includes a set of environmental attributes whose values a user would never consider to be directly indicative of an anomaly. However, such attributes cannot be ignored because they have a direct effect on the expected distribution of the result attributes whose values can indicate an anomalous observation. This paper describes a general purpose method called conditional anomaly detection for taking such differences among attributes into account, and proposes three different expectation-maximization algorithms for learning the model that is used in conditional anomaly detection. Experiments with more than 13 different data sets compare our algorithms with several other more standard methods for outlier or anomaly detection
Xiuyao Song, Mingxi Wu, Chris Jermaine, Sanjay Ranka
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1