The ACM Lifelog Search Challenge (LSC) is an annual comparative benchmarking exercise that brings together researchers in the field of multimedia retrieval to evaluate interactive search systems using a large-scale multimodal lifelog dataset. This paper presents an overview of the ninth edition of the challenge (LSC’26), held as a workshop during the ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (ICMR ’26) in Amsterdam. To broaden its scope, the workshop now features three submission tracks: the traditional Challenge Track for real-time search performance, a new General Lifelog Research Track for theoretical and architectural advancements, and an additional Open Source Track aimed at enhancing reproducibility and reducing barriers to entry for new participants.

For the eighth time since 2018, the ACM Lifelog Search Challenge (LSC) was run to compare interactive lifelog search systems in a live metrics-based challenge. The goal of the LSC workshop is to comparatively evaluate the capabilities of systems accessing a large multimodal lifelog. LSC'25 attracted eleven participating teams, each of which had developed an innovative interactive lifelog retrieval system. The benchmark was organised in a hybrid manner (due to political issues in 2025) at the LSC workshop at ACM ICMR'25 in Chicago, USA. This short paper summarises the LSC workshop setting and presents the participating lifelog search systems.

For the seventh time since 2018, the Lifelog Search Challenge (LSC) benchmarked interactive lifelog search systems in a live challenge. The LSC goal is to comparatively evaluate system capabilities to access large multimodal lifelogs comprising hundreds of thousands of records. LSC'24 attracted an unprecedented record number of twenty-one participating teams, where each team proposes innovative ideas implemented to new or already established interactive lifelog retrieval systems. The benchmark was organised in front of a live audience at the LSC workshop at ACM ICMR'24 in Phuket, Thailand. This short paper summarises the LSC workshop setting and presents the participating lifelog search systems.

For the sixth time since 2018, the Lifelog Search Challenge (LSC) was organized as a comparative benchmarking exercise for various interactive lifelog search systems. The goal of this international competition is to test system capabilities to access large multimodal lifelogs. LSC’23 attracted twelve participanting teams, each of whom had developed a competitive interactive lifelog retrieval system. The benchmark was organized in front of live audience at the LSC workshop at ACM ICMR’23. As in previous editions, this introductory paper presents the LSC workshop and introduces the participating lifelog search systems.

The creation of datasets in medical imaging is a central topic of research, especially with the advances of deep learning in the past decade. Publications of such datasets typically report baseline results with one or more deep neural networks in the form of established performance metrics (e.g., F1-score, Jaccard, etc.). Then, much work is done trying to beat these baseline metrics to compare different neural architectures. However, these reported metrics are almost meaningless when the underlying data does not conform to specific standards. In order to better understand what standards we need, we have reproduced and analyzed a study of four medical image classification datasets in laparoscopy. With automated frame extraction of surgical videos, we find that the resulting images are way too similar and produce high evaluation metrics by design. We show this similarity with a basic SIFT algorithm that produces high evaluation metrics on the original data. We confirm our hypothesis by creating and evaluating a video-based dataset split from the original images. The original network evaluated on the video-based split performs worse than our basic SIFT algorithm on the original data.

For the fifth time since 2018, the Lifelog Search Challenge (LSC) facilitated a benchmarking exercise to compare interactive search systems designed for multimodal lifelogs. LSC'22 attracted nine participating research groups who developed interactive lifelog retrieval systems enabling fast and effective access to lifelogs. The systems competed in front of a hybrid audience at the LSC workshop at ACM ICMR'22. This paper presents an introduction to the LSC workshop, the new (larger) dataset used in the competition, and introduces the participating lifelog search systems.

The Lifelog Search Challenge (LSC) is an annual benchmarking challenge for comparing approaches to interactive retrieval from multi-modal lifelogs. LSC'21, the fourth challenge, attracted sixteen participants, each of which had developed interactive retrieval systems for large multimodal lifelogs. These interactive retrieval systems participated in a comparative evaluation in front of an online live-audience at the LSC workshop at ACM ICMR'21. This overview presents the motivation for LSC'21, the lifelog dataset used in the competition, and the participating systems.

The Lifelog Search Challenge (LSC) is an annual comparative benchmarking activity for comparing approaches to interactive retrieval from multi-modal lifelogs. LSC'20, the third such challenge, attracts fourteen participants with their interactive lifelog retrieval systems. These systems are comparatively evaluated in front of a live-audience at the LSC workshop at ACM ICMR'20 in Dublin, Ireland. This overview motivates the challenge, presents the dataset and system configuration used in the challenge, and briefly presents the participating teams.

Accumulating recordings of daily conducted surgical interventions such as endoscopic procedures for the long term generates very large video archives that are both difficult to search and explore. Since physicians utilize this kind of media routinely for documentation, treatment planning or education and training, it can be considered a crucial task to make said archives manageable in regards to discovering or retrieving relevant content. We present an interactive tool including a multitude of modalities for browsing, searching and filtering medical content, demonstrating its usefulness on over 140 hours of pre-processed laparoscopic surgery videos.

The Video Browser Showdown (VBS) has influenced the Multimedia community already for 10 years now. More than 30 unique teams from over 21 countries participated in the VBS since 2012 already. In 2021, we are celebrating the 10th anniversary of VBS, where 17 international teams compete against each other in an unprecedented contest of fast and accurate multimedia retrieval. In this tutorial we discuss the motivation and details of the VBS contest, including its history, rules, evaluation metrics, and achievements for multimedia retrieval. We talk about the properties of specific VBS retrieval systems and their unique characteristics, as well as existing open-source tools that can be used as a starting point for participating for the first time. Participants of this tutorial get a detailed understanding of the VBS and its search systems, and see the latest developments of interactive video retrieval.

In this work we analyze content statistics of the V3C1 dataset, which is the first partition of theVimeo Creative Commons Collection (V3C). The dataset has been designed to represent true web videos in the wild, with good visual quality and diverse content characteristics, and will serve as evaluation basis for the Video Browser Showdown 2019-2021 and TREC Video Retrieval (TRECVID) Ad-Hoc Video Search tasks 2019-2021. The dataset comes with a shot segmentation (around 1 million shots) for which we analyze content specifics and statistics. Our research shows that the content of V3C1 is very diverse, has no predominant characteristics and provides a low self-similarity. Thus it is very well suited for video retrieval evaluations as well as for participants of TRECVID AVS or the VBS.

We present a tutorial focusing on video retrieval tasks, where state-of-the-art deep learning approaches still benefit from interactive decisions of users. The tutorial covers general introduction to the interactive video retrieval research area, state-of-the-art video retrieval systems, evaluation campaigns and recently observed results. Moreover, a significant part of the tutorial is dedicated to a practical exercise with three selected state-of-the-art systems in the form of an interactive video retrieval competition. Participants of this tutorial will gain a practical experience and also a general insight of the interactive video retrieval topic, which is a good start to focus their research on unsolved challenges in this area.

Modern day endoscopic technology enables medical staff to conveniently document surgeries via recording raw treatment footage, which can be utilized for planning further proceedings, future case revisitations or even educational purposes. However, the prospect of manually perusing recorded media files constitutes a tedious additional workload on physicians' already packed timetables and therefore ultimately represents a burden rather than a benefit. The aim of this PhD project is to improve upon this situation by closely collaborating with medical experts in order to devise datasets and systems to facilitate semi-automatic post-surgical media processing.

Due to increasing possibilities to create digital video, we are facing the emergence of large video archives that are made accessible either online or offline. Though a lot of research has been spent on video retrieval tools and methods, which allow for automatic search in videos, still the performance of automatic video retrieval is far from optimal. At the same time, the organization of personal data is receiving increasing research attention due to the challenges that are faced in gathering, enriching, searching and visualizing this data. Given the increasing quantities of personal data being gathered by individuals, the concept of a heterogeneous personal digital libraries of rich multimedia and sensory content for every individual is becoming a reality.

Mobile devices like smartphones and tablets are becoming increasingly capable in terms of processing power. Although they are already used in computer vision, no comparable measurement experiments of the popular OpenCV framework have been made yet. We try to fill this gap by evaluating the performance of a set of typical OpenCV operations, on mobile devices like the iPad Air and iPhone 5S. We compare those results with the performance of a consumer grade laptop PC (MacBook Pro). Our tests span from simple image manipulation methods to keypoint detection and descriptor extraction as well as descriptor matching. Results show that the top performing device can match the performance of the PC up to 80 percent in specific operations.

As mobile devices become more and more pervasive, they are increasingly used to record and watch personal and professional videos. Common video browsers on smart phones and tablets, however, fail to provide users an efficient and engaging experience to browse through video content. In this demo paper, we present an early prototype for browsing videos on tablets: browsing video with a 3D filmstrip. A video is split up into equidistant, uniformly sampled time segments. The segments are represented by key-frames shown on the surface of a filmstrip, allowing an immediate overview of great parts of the video. Further, a user can scroll through the filmstrip, start playback for any segment and refine the preview of segments by simple touch gestures.

With users increasingly using their mobile devices such as smartphones as digital photo albums, effective methods for managing these collections are becoming increasingly important. Standard solutions provide only limited facilities for organising, browsing and searching image collections on mobile devices, making it challenging and time-consuming to locate images of interest.

We demonstrate an interactive 3D storyboard that take advantage of 3D graphics in order to overcome certain limitations of conventional 2D storyboards when used for the task of image and video browsing.