Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Van Oleson
dblp:38/6232
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 44% Storage systems · 44% Cloud and datacenter computing · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › data redundancy
data mirroring |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Adaptable Mirroring in Cluster Servers · HPDC 2001 |
High-performance computing › cluster computing
server cluster |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Adaptable Mirroring in Cluster Servers · HPDC 2001 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
quality of service |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Adaptable Mirroring in Cluster Servers · HPDC 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
middleware-level mirroring · 0.0event filtering · 0.0coalescing · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | A Practical Approach for ?Zero? Downtime in an Operational Information SystemabstractAn operational information system (OIS) supports a real-time view of an organization's information critical to its logistical business operations. A central component of an OIS is an engine that integrates data events captured from distributed, remote sources in order to derive meaningful real-time views of current operations. This event derivation engine (EDE) continuously updates these views and also publishes them to a potentially large number of remote subscribers. The paper first describes a sample OIS and EDE in the context of an airline's operations. It then defines the performance and availability requirements to be met by this system, specifically focusing on the EDE component. One particular requirement for the EDE is that subscribers to its output events should not experience downtime due to EDE failures, crashes or increased processing loads. Toward this end, we develop and evaluate a practical technique for masking failures and for hiding the costs of recovery from EDE subscribers. This technique utilizes redundant EDEs that coordinate view replicas with a relaxed synchronous fault tolerance protocol. A combination of pre- and post-buffering of replicas is used to attain a solution that offers low response times (i.e., 'zero' downtime) while also preventing system failures in the presence of deterministic faults like 'ill-formed' messages. Parallelism realized via a cluster machine and application-specific techniques for reducing synchronization across replicas are used to scale a 'zero' downtime EDE to support the large number of subscribers it must service. Ada Gavrilovska, Karsten Schwan, Van Oleson |
ICDCS | 3 |
| 2001 | Adaptable Mirroring in Cluster ServersabstractThis paper presents a software architecture for continuously mirroring streaming data received by one node of a cluster-based server to other cluster nodes. The intent is to distribute the load on the server generated by the data's processing and distribution to many clients. This is particularly important when the server not only processes streaming data, but also performs additional processing tasks that heavily depend on current application state. One such task is the preparation of suitable initialization state for thin clients, so that such clients can understand future data events being streamed to them. In particular, when large numbers of thin clients must be initialized at the same time, initialization must be performed without jeopardizing the quality of service offered to regular clients continuing to receive data streams. The mirroring framework presented and evaluated has several novel aspects. First, by performing mirroring at the middleware level, application semantics may be used to reduce mirroring traffic, including filtering events based on their content, by coalescing certain events, or by simply varying mirroring rates according to current application needs concerning the consistencies of mirrored vs. original data. Second, we present an adaptive algorithm that varies mirror consistency and thereby, mirroring overheads in response to changes in clients' request behavior. Third, our framework not only mirrors events, but it can also mirror the new states computed from incoming events, thus enabling dynamic tradeoffs in the communication vs. computation loads imposed on the server node receiving events and on its mirror nodes. Ada Gavrilovska, Karsten Schwan, Van Oleson |
HPDC | 3 |