VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Flavio Lerda
dblp:38/6631
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 5Computer networks · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification › model checking
bounded model checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Proof-guided underapproximation-widening for multi-process systems · POPL 2005 |
Program verification
model checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Proof-guided underapproximation-widening for multi-process systems · POPL 2005 |
Program verification
underapproximation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Proof-guided underapproximation-widening for multi-process systems · POPL 2005 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
counterexample explanation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Understanding Counterexamples with explain · CAV 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unsatisfiability proof · 0.1SAT solver · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Proof-guided underapproximation-widening for multi-process systemsabstractThis paper presents a procedure for the verification of multi-process systems based on considering a series of underapproximated models. The procedure checks models with an increasing set of allowed interleavings of the given set of processes, starting from a single interleaving. The procedure relies on SAT solvers' ability to produce proofs of unsatisfiability: from these proofs it derives information that guides the process of adding interleavings on the one hand, and determines termination on the other. The presented approach is integrated in a SAT-based Bounded Model Checking (BMC) framework. Thus, a BMC formulation of a multi-process system is introduced, which allows controlling which interleavings are considered. Preliminary experimental results demonstrate the practical impact of the presented method. Orna Grumberg, Flavio Lerda, Ofer Strichman, Michael Theobald |
POPL | 2 |
| 2004 | Understanding Counterexamples with explain
Alex Groce, Daniel Kroening, Flavio Lerda |
CAV | 3 |
| 2004 | A Tool for Checking ANSI-C Programs
Edmund M. Clarke, Daniel Kroening, Flavio Lerda |
TACAS | 3 |
| 2003 | Model Checking Programs
Willem Visser, Klaus Havelund, Guillaume Brat, Seungjoon Park, Flavio Lerda |
Autom. Softw. Eng. | 5 |
| 2002 | From States to Transitions: Improving Translation of LTL Formulae to Büchi Automata
Dimitra Giannakopoulou, Flavio Lerda |
FORTE | 2 |