Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Geoffrey A. Chua
dblp:38/7874
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4278-5961ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 77% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 23% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
2.3 | 3 | 2025 | Exploiting Hidden Symmetry to Improve Objective Perturbation for DP Linear Learners with a Nonsmooth L1-Norm · ICLR 2025 Noisy Dual Mirror Descent: A Near Optimal Algorithm for Jointly-DP Convex Resource Allocation · NeurIPS 2024 Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization under a Quantile Loss Function · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | Noisy Dual Mirror Descent: A Near Optimal Algorithm for Jointly-DP Convex Resource Allocation · NeurIPS 2024 Exploiting Hidden Symmetry to Improve Objective Perturbation for DP Linear Learners with a Nonsmooth L1-Norm · ICLR 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy mechanism design
objective perturbation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploiting Hidden Symmetry to Improve Objective Perturbation for DP Linear Learners with a Nonsmooth L1-Norm · ICLR 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
private convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploiting Hidden Symmetry to Improve Objective Perturbation for DP Linear Learners with a Nonsmooth L1-Norm · ICLR 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › distributed differential privacy
joint differential privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Noisy Dual Mirror Descent: A Near Optimal Algorithm for Jointly-DP Convex Resource Allocation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
resource allocation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Noisy Dual Mirror Descent: A Near Optimal Algorithm for Jointly-DP Convex Resource Allocation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization under a Quantile Loss Function · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic convex optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization under a Quantile Loss Function · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization under a Quantile Loss Function · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonsmooth optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Exploiting Hidden Symmetry to Improve Objective Perturbation for DP Linear Learners with a Nonsmooth L1-Norm · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
objective perturbation · 3.1convolution smoothing · 3.1weak duality · 1.5noisy dual mirror descent · 1.5DP stochastic gradient descent · 1.3minimax lower bounds · 0.8minimax lower bound · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Exploiting Hidden Symmetry to Improve Objective Perturbation for DP Linear Learners with a Nonsmooth L1-NormabstractObjective Perturbation (OP) is a classic approach to differentially private (DP) convex optimization with smooth loss functions but is less understood for nonsmooth cases. In this work, we study how to apply OP to DP linear learners under loss functions with an implicit $\ell_1$-norm structure, such as $\max(0,x)$ as a motivating example. We propose to first smooth out the implicit $\ell_1$-norm by convolution, and then invoke standard OP. Convolution has many advantages that distinguish itself from Moreau Envelope, such as approximating from above and a higher degree of hyperparameters. These advantages, in conjunction with the symmetry of $\ell_1$-norm, result in tighter pointwise approximation, which further facilitates tighter analysis of generalization risks by using pointwise bounds. Under mild assumptions on groundtruth distributions, the proposed OP-based algorithm is found to be rate-optimal, and can achieve the excess generalization risk $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}+\frac{\sqrt{d\ln(1/\delta)}}{n\varepsilon})$. Experiments demonstrate the competitive performance of the proposed method to Noisy-SGD. Geoffrey A. Chua |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Noisy Dual Mirror Descent: A Near Optimal Algorithm for Jointly-DP Convex Resource AllocationabstractWe study convex resource allocation problems with $m$ hard constraints under $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-joint differential privacy (Joint-DP or JDP) in an offline setting. To approximately solve the problem, we propose a generic algorithm called Noisy Dual Mirror Descent. The algorithm applies noisy Mirror Descent to a dual problem from relaxing the hard constraints for private shadow prices, and then uses the shadow prices to coordinate allocations in the primal problem. Leveraging weak duality theory, we show that the optimality gap is upper bounded by $\mathcal{O}(\frac{\sqrt{m\ln(1/\delta)}}{\varepsilon})$, and constraint violation is no more than $\mathcal{O}(\frac{\sqrt{m\ln(1/\delta)}}{\varepsilon})$ per constraint. When strong duality holds, both preceding results can be improved to $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{\sqrt{\ln(1/\delta)}}{\varepsilon})$ by better utilizing the geometric structure of the dual space, which is neglected by existing works. To complement our results under strong duality, we derive a minimax lower bound $\Omega(\frac{m}{\varepsilon})$ for any JDP algorithm outputting feasible allocations. The lower bound matches our upper bounds up to some logarithmic factors for $\varepsilon\geq \max(1, 1/(n\gamma))$, where $n\gamma$ is the available resource level. Numerical studies further confirm the effectiveness of our algorithm. Geoffrey A. Chua |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization under a Quantile Loss FunctionabstractWe study $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differentially private (DP) stochastic convex optimization under an $r$-th quantile loss function taking the form $c(u) = ru^+ + (1-r)(-u)^+$. The function is non-smooth, and we propose to approximate it with a smooth function obtained by convolution smoothing, which enjoys both structure and bandwidth flexibility and can address outliers. This leads to a better approximation than those obtained from existing methods such as Moreau Envelope. We then design private algorithms based on DP stochastic gradient descent and objective perturbation, and show that both algorithms achieve (near) optimal excess generalization risk $O(\max\{\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}, \frac{\sqrt{d\ln(1/\delta)}}{n\varepsilon}\})$. Through objective perturbation, we further derive an upper bound $O(\max\{\sqrt{\frac{d}{n}}, \sqrt{\frac{d\ln(1/\delta)}{n\varepsilon}}\})$ on the parameter estimation error under mild assumptions on data generating processes. Some applications in private quantile regression and private inventory control will be discussed. Geoffrey A. Chua |
ICML | 2 |