Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
James Drew
dblp:38/811
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Statistics and Data Mining Techniques for Lifetime Value Modeling · KDD 1999 |
Data mining › clustering › user clustering
customer segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Statistics and Data Mining Techniques for Lifetime Value Modeling · KDD 1999 |
Data mining › statistical analysis
survival analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Statistics and Data Mining Techniques for Lifetime Value Modeling · KDD 1999 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › instance-based learning
nearest neighbor methods |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Estimating business targets · KDD 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nearest neighbor · 0.1econometric frontier analysis · 0.1proportional hazards regression · 0.0neural network · 0.0clustering · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Estimating business targetsabstractDetermining and setting maximal revenue expectations or other business performance targets---whether it is for regional company divisions or individual customers---can have profound financial implications. Operational techniques are changed, staffing levels are altered and management attention is re-focused---all in the name of expectations. In practice these expectations are often derived in an ad hoc manner. To address this unsupervised task, we combine nearest neighbor methods and classical statistical methods and derive a new solution to the classical econometric task of frontier analysis. We apply our methodology to two real world business problems in Verizon, a major telecommunications provider in the United States, more specifically in the print yellow page division Verizon Information Services: (1) identifying under marketed customers for targeted upselling campaigns and focused sales attention, and (2) benchmarking regional directory divisions to incent performance improvements. Our analysis uncovers some commercially useful aspects of these domains and by conservative estimates can increase revenue by several million dollars in each domain. Piew Datta, James Drew, Andrew Betz, D. R. Mani, Jeffery Howard |
KDD | 2 |
| 1999 | Statistics and Data Mining Techniques for Lifetime Value ModelingabstractCustomer lifetime value (LTV)-which is a measure of the profit generating potential, or value, of a customer-is increasingly being considered a touchstone for customer relationship management.The central challenge in predicting LTV is the production of estimated customer tenures with a given service supplier, based on information contained in company databases.Classical survival analysis techniques like proportional hazards regression focus on covariate effects frequently presumed to be linear, and examination of age-wise effects can be difficult.Further, segments of customers, whose lifetimes and covariate effects can vary widely, are not necessarily easy to detect.A new neural network model for hazard prediction is used to free proportional hazards-like models from their linearity and proportionality constraints, and clustering tools are applied to identify segments of customer hazard patterns.Using the proportional hazards and neural network models in tandem, we demonstrate how data mining tools can be apt complements of the classical statistical models, and show that their combined usage overcomes many of the shortcomings of each separate tool setresulting in a LTV tenure prediction model that is both accurate and understandable. D. R. Mani, James Drew, Andrew Betz, Piew Datta |
KDD | 2 |