Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Markus Saers
dblp:38/8151
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-0744-5075ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 72% Information extraction and text analysis · 28% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Audio and music processing › music generation
lyrics generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Learning to Freestyle: Hip Hop Challenge-Response Induction via Transduction Rule Segmentation · EMNLP 2013 |
Audio and music processing
music generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Learning to Freestyle: Hip Hop Challenge-Response Induction via Transduction Rule Segmentation · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Single Malt or Blended? A Study in Multilingual Parser Optimization · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual models |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Single Malt or Blended? A Study in Multilingual Parser Optimization · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unsupervised transduction grammar induction · 0.3rule segmentation · 0.3rhyme scheme detection · 0.3parser optimization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Handling Ties Correctly and Efficiently in Viterbi Training Using the Viterbi Semiring
Markus Saers, Dekai Wu |
LATA | 1 |
| 2015 | Improving semantic SMT via soft semantic role label constraints on ITG alignmens
Meriem Beloucif, Markus Saers, Dekai Wu |
MTSummit | 2 |
| 2013 | Learning to Freestyle: Hip Hop Challenge-Response Induction via Transduction Rule SegmentationabstractWe present a novel model, Freestyle, that learns to improvise rhyming and fluent responses upon being challenged with a line of hip hop lyrics, by combining both bottomup token based rule induction and top-down rule segmentation strategies to learn a stochastic transduction grammar that simultaneously learns both phrasing and rhyming associations.In this attack on the woefully under-explored natural language genre of music lyrics, we exploit a strictly unsupervised transduction grammar induction approach.Our task is particularly ambitious in that no use of any a priori linguistic or phonetic information is allowed, even though the domain of hip hop lyrics is particularly noisy and unstructured.We evaluate the performance of the learned model against a model learned only using the more conventional bottom-up token based rule induction, and demonstrate the superiority of our combined token based and rule segmentation induction method toward generating higher quality improvised responses, measured on fluency and rhyming criteria as judged by human evaluators.To highlight some of the inherent challenges in adapting other algorithms to this novel task, we also compare the quality of the responses generated by our model to those generated by an out-ofthe-box phrase based SMT system.We tackle the challenge of selecting appropriate training data for our task via a dedicated rhyme scheme detection module, which is also acquired via unsupervised learning and report improved quality of the generated responses.Finally, we report results with Maghrebi French hip hop lyrics indicating that our model performs surprisingly well with no special adaptation to other languages. Dekai Wu, Karteek Addanki, Markus Saers, Meriem Beloucif |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2013 | Bayesian Induction of Bracketing Inversion Transduction Grammars
Markus Saers, Dekai Wu |
IJCNLP | 1 |
| 2013 | Freestyle: a challenge-response system for hip hop lyrics via unsupervised induction of stochastic transduction grammarsabstractWe attack an inexplicably under-explored language genre of spoken language-lyrics in music-via completely unsupervised induction of an SMT-style stochastic transduction grammar for hip hop lyrics, yielding a fully-automatically learned challenge-response system that produces rhyming lyrics given an input. Unlike previous efforts, we choose the domain of hip hop lyrics, which is particularly unstructured and noisy. A novel feature of our approach is that it is completely unsupervised and requires no a priori linguistic or phonetic knowledge. In spite of the level of difficulty of the challenge, the model nevertheless produces fluent output as judged by human evaluators, and performs significantly better than widely used phrase-based SMT models upon the same task. Dekai Wu, Karteek Addanki, Markus Saers |
INTERSPEECH | 3 |
| 2013 | Modeling Hip Hop Challenge-Response Lyrics as Machine Translation
Karteek Addanki, Markus Saers, Dekai Wu |
MTSummit | 2 |
| 2012 | From Finite-State to Inversion Transductions: Toward Unsupervised Bilingual Grammar Induction
Markus Saers, Karteek Addanki, Dekai Wu |
COLING | 1 |
| 2012 | LTG vs. ITG Coverage of Cross-Lingual Verb Frame Alternations
Karteek Addanki, Chi-kiu Lo, Markus Saers, Dekai Wu |
EAMT | 3 |
| 2011 | Principled Induction of Phrasal Bilexica
Markus Saers, Dekai Wu |
EAMT | 1 |
| 2011 | Speech Translation with Grammar Driven Probabilistic Phrasal Bilexica ExtractionabstractWe introduce a new type of transduction grammar that allows for learning of probabilistic phrasal bilexica, leading to a significant improvement in spoken language translation accuracy. The current state-of-the-art in statistical machine translation relies on a complicated and crude pipeline to learn probabilistic phrasal bilexica—the very core of any speech translation system. In this paper, we present a more principled approach to learning probabilistic phrasal bilexica, based on stochastic transduction grammar learning applicable to speech corpora. Index Terms: speech translation, transduction theory, lexicon extraction Markus Saers, Dekai Wu, Chi-kiu Lo, Karteek Addanki |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2011 | On the Expressivity of Linear Transductions
Markus Saers, Dekai Wu, Chris Quirk |
MTSummit | 1 |
| 2010 | Word Alignment with Stochastic Bracketing Linear Inversion Transduction Grammar
Markus Saers, Joakim Nivre, Dekai Wu |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2008 | Mixing and Blending Syntactic and Semantic Dependencies
Yvonne Samuelsson, Oscar Täckström, Sumithra Velupillai, Johan Eklund, Mark Fishel, Markus Saers |
CoNLL | 6 |
| 2007 | Single Malt or Blended? A Study in Multilingual Parser Optimization
Johan Hall, Jens Nilsson 0001, Joakim Nivre, Gülsen Eryigit, Beáta Megyesi, Mattias Nilsson 0003, Markus Saers |
EMNLP-CoNLL | 7 |