Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Steve Muller
dblp:38/8172
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 3 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 67% Network security · 33% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Search-based test and improvement of machine-learning-based anomaly detection systems · ISSTA 2019 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Search-based test and improvement of machine-learning-based anomaly detection systems · ISSTA 2019 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
training-time attack |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Search-based test and improvement of machine-learning-based anomaly detection systems · ISSTA 2019 |
Software testing
search-based software testing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Search-based test and improvement of machine-learning-based anomaly detection systems · ISSTA 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
search-based optimization · 0.8co-evolutionary search · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Search-based test and improvement of machine-learning-based anomaly detection systemsabstractMachine-learning-based anomaly detection systems can be vulnerable to new kinds of deceptions, known as training attacks, which exploit the live learning mechanism of these systems by progressively injecting small portions of abnormal data. The injected data seamlessly swift the learned states to a point where harmful data can pass unnoticed. We focus on the systematic testing of these attacks in the context of intrusion detection systems (IDS). We propose a search-based approach to test IDS by making training attacks. Going a step further, we also propose searching for countermeasures, learning from the successful attacks and thereby increasing the resilience of the tested IDS. We evaluate our approach on a denial-of-service attack detection scenario and a dataset recording the network traffic of a real-world system. Our experiments show that our search-based attack scheme generates successful attacks bypassing the current state-of-the-art defences. We also show that our approach is capable of generating attack patterns for all configuration states of the studied IDS and that it is capable of providing appropriate countermeasures. By co-evolving our attack and defence mechanisms we succeeded at improving the defence of the IDS under test by making it resilient to 49 out of 50 independently generated attacks. Maxime Cordy, Steve Muller, Mike Papadakis, Yves Le Traon |
ISSTA | 2 |
| 2018 | A training-resistant anomaly detection system
Steve Muller, Jean Lancrenon, Carlo Harpes, Yves Le Traon, Sylvain Gombault, Jean-Marie Bonnin |
Comput. Secur. | 1 |
| 2017 | Efficiently computing the likelihoods of cyclically interdependent risk scenarios
Steve Muller, Carlo Harpes, Yves Le Traon, Sylvain Gombault, Jean-Marie Bonnin |
Comput. Secur. | 1 |
| 2016 | Dynamic Risk Analyses and Dependency-Aware Root Cause Model for Critical Infrastructures
Steve Muller, Carlo Harpes, Yves Le Traon, Sylvain Gombault, Jean-Marie Bonnin, Paul Hoffmann |
CRITIS | 1 |