Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steve Muller

dblp:38/8172 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 67% Network security · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection
0.412019
Search-based test and improvement of machine-learning-based anomaly detection systems · ISSTA 2019
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack
0.412019
Search-based test and improvement of machine-learning-based anomaly detection systems · ISSTA 2019
Security and privacy of machine learning
training-time attack
0.412019
Search-based test and improvement of machine-learning-based anomaly detection systems · ISSTA 2019
Software testing
search-based software testing
0.412019
Search-based test and improvement of machine-learning-based anomaly detection systems · ISSTA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

search-based optimization · 0.8co-evolutionary search · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Search-based test and improvement of machine-learning-based anomaly detection systems
abstract
Machine-learning-based anomaly detection systems can be vulnerable to new kinds of deceptions, known as training attacks, which exploit the live learning mechanism of these systems by progressively injecting small portions of abnormal data. The injected data seamlessly swift the learned states to a point where harmful data can pass unnoticed. We focus on the systematic testing of these attacks in the context of intrusion detection systems (IDS). We propose a search-based approach to test IDS by making training attacks. Going a step further, we also propose searching for countermeasures, learning from the successful attacks and thereby increasing the resilience of the tested IDS. We evaluate our approach on a denial-of-service attack detection scenario and a dataset recording the network traffic of a real-world system. Our experiments show that our search-based attack scheme generates successful attacks bypassing the current state-of-the-art defences. We also show that our approach is capable of generating attack patterns for all configuration states of the studied IDS and that it is capable of providing appropriate countermeasures. By co-evolving our attack and defence mechanisms we succeeded at improving the defence of the IDS under test by making it resilient to 49 out of 50 independently generated attacks.
Maxime Cordy, Steve Muller, Mike Papadakis, Yves Le Traon
ISSTA2
2018 A training-resistant anomaly detection system
Steve Muller, Jean Lancrenon, Carlo Harpes, Yves Le Traon, Sylvain Gombault, Jean-Marie Bonnin
Comput. Secur.1
2017 Efficiently computing the likelihoods of cyclically interdependent risk scenarios
Steve Muller, Carlo Harpes, Yves Le Traon, Sylvain Gombault, Jean-Marie Bonnin
Comput. Secur.1
2016 Dynamic Risk Analyses and Dependency-Aware Root Cause Model for Critical Infrastructures
Steve Muller, Carlo Harpes, Yves Le Traon, Sylvain Gombault, Jean-Marie Bonnin, Paul Hoffmann
CRITIS1