VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pallika H. Kanani
dblp:38/8313
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Reinforcement learning · 15% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 8% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrieval · SIGIR 2010 |
Information retrieval › ranking › search ranking
proximity ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrieval · SIGIR 2010 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrieval · SIGIR 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity resolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Improving Author Coreference by Resource-Bounded Information Gathering from the Web · IJCAI 2007 |
Information retrieval
web search |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Improving Author Coreference by Resource-Bounded Information Gathering from the Web · IJCAI 2007 |
Algorithms and data structures
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Resource-Bounded Information Gathering for Correlation Clustering · COLT 2007 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
correlation clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Resource-Bounded Information Gathering for Correlation Clustering · COLT 2007 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
action selection |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Selecting actions for resource-bounded information extraction using reinforcement learning · WSDM 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
information gathering |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Resource-Bounded Information Gathering for Correlation Clustering · COLT 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
temporal difference q-learning · 0.1samplerank · 0.1resource-bounded information gathering · 0.1reinforcement learning · 0.1active information acquisition · 0.1proximity features · 0.1phrase features · 0.1machine learning ranking · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Selecting actions for resource-bounded information extraction using reinforcement learningabstractGiven a database with missing or uncertain content, our goal is to correct and fill the database by extracting specific information from a large corpus such as the Web, and to do so under resource limitations. We formulate the information gathering task as a series of choices among alternative, resource-consuming actions and use reinforcement learning to select the best action at each time step. We use temporal difference q-learning method to train the function that selects these actions, and compare it to an online, error-driven algorithm called SampleRank. We present a system that finds information such as email, job title and department affiliation for the faculty at our university, and show that the learning-based approach accomplishes this task efficiently under a limited action budget. Our evaluations show that we can obtain 92.4% of the final F1, by only using 14.3% of all possible actions. Pallika H. Kanani, Andrew McCallum |
WSDM | 1 |
| 2010 | Resource-Bounded Information Extraction: Acquiring Missing Feature Values on Demand
Pallika H. Kanani, Andrew McCallum, Shaohan Hu |
PAKDD (1) | 1 |
| 2010 | How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrievalabstractRanking search results is a fundamental problem in information retrieval. In this paper we explore whether the use of proximity and phrase information can improve web retrieval accuracy. We build on existing research by incorporating novel ranking features based on flexible proximity terms with recent state-of-the-art machine learning ranking models. We introduce a method of determining the goodness of a set of proximity terms that takes advantage of the structured nature of web documents, document metadata, and phrasal information from search engine user query logs. We perform experiments on a large real-world Web data collection and show that using the goodness score of flexible proximity terms can improve ranking accuracy over state-of-the-art ranking methods by as much as 13%. We also show that we can improve accuracy on the hardest queries by as much as 9% relative to state-of-the-art approaches. Krysta M. Svore, Pallika H. Kanani, Nazan Khan |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2007 | Resource-Bounded Information Gathering for Correlation Clustering
Pallika H. Kanani, Andrew McCallum |
COLT | 1 |
| 2007 | Improving Author Coreference by Resource-Bounded Information Gathering from the Web
Pallika H. Kanani, Andrew McCallum, Christopher Joseph Pal |
IJCAI | 1 |