Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pallika H. Kanani

dblp:38/8313 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Reinforcement learning · 15% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 8%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.112010
How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrieval · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval › ranking › search ranking
proximity ranking
0.112010
How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrieval · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval
ranking
0.112010
How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrieval · SIGIR 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity resolution
0.112007
Improving Author Coreference by Resource-Bounded Information Gathering from the Web · IJCAI 2007
Information retrieval
web search
0.112007
Improving Author Coreference by Resource-Bounded Information Gathering from the Web · IJCAI 2007
Algorithms and data structures
clustering
0.112007
Resource-Bounded Information Gathering for Correlation Clustering · COLT 2007
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
correlation clustering
0.112007
Resource-Bounded Information Gathering for Correlation Clustering · COLT 2007
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
action selection
0.012012
Selecting actions for resource-bounded information extraction using reinforcement learning · WSDM 2012
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
information gathering
0.012007
Resource-Bounded Information Gathering for Correlation Clustering · COLT 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal difference q-learning · 0.1samplerank · 0.1resource-bounded information gathering · 0.1reinforcement learning · 0.1active information acquisition · 0.1proximity features · 0.1phrase features · 0.1machine learning ranking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Selecting actions for resource-bounded information extraction using reinforcement learning
abstract
Given a database with missing or uncertain content, our goal is to correct and fill the database by extracting specific information from a large corpus such as the Web, and to do so under resource limitations. We formulate the information gathering task as a series of choices among alternative, resource-consuming actions and use reinforcement learning to select the best action at each time step. We use temporal difference q-learning method to train the function that selects these actions, and compare it to an online, error-driven algorithm called SampleRank. We present a system that finds information such as email, job title and department affiliation for the faculty at our university, and show that the learning-based approach accomplishes this task efficiently under a limited action budget. Our evaluations show that we can obtain 92.4% of the final F1, by only using 14.3% of all possible actions.
Pallika H. Kanani, Andrew McCallum
WSDM1
2010 Resource-Bounded Information Extraction: Acquiring Missing Feature Values on Demand
Pallika H. Kanani, Andrew McCallum, Shaohan Hu
PAKDD (1)1
2010 How good is a span of terms?: exploiting proximity to improve web retrieval
abstract
Ranking search results is a fundamental problem in information retrieval. In this paper we explore whether the use of proximity and phrase information can improve web retrieval accuracy. We build on existing research by incorporating novel ranking features based on flexible proximity terms with recent state-of-the-art machine learning ranking models. We introduce a method of determining the goodness of a set of proximity terms that takes advantage of the structured nature of web documents, document metadata, and phrasal information from search engine user query logs. We perform experiments on a large real-world Web data collection and show that using the goodness score of flexible proximity terms can improve ranking accuracy over state-of-the-art ranking methods by as much as 13%. We also show that we can improve accuracy on the hardest queries by as much as 9% relative to state-of-the-art approaches.
Krysta M. Svore, Pallika H. Kanani, Nazan Khan
SIGIR2
2007 Resource-Bounded Information Gathering for Correlation Clustering
Pallika H. Kanani, Andrew McCallum
COLT1
2007 Improving Author Coreference by Resource-Bounded Information Gathering from the Web
Pallika H. Kanani, Andrew McCallum, Christopher Joseph Pal
IJCAI1