Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christophe Roux
dblp:38/9497
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 71% Approximation and online algorithms · 11% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 11% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 52% Reinforcement learning · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 18% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Byzantine-Resilience of Distillation-Based Federated Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
byzantine robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Byzantine-Resilience of Distillation-Based Federated Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Byzantine-Resilience of Distillation-Based Federated Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On the Byzantine-Resilience of Distillation-Based Federated Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Riemannian Optimism with Applications to Min-Max Problems · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Riemannian Optimism with Applications to Min-Max Problems · ICML 2025 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Riemannian Optimism with Applications to Min-Max Problems · ICML 2025 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Riemannian Optimism with Applications to Min-Max Problems · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Convergence and Trade-Offs in Riemannian Gradient Descent and Riemannian Proximal Point · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › riemannian optimization
geodesically convex optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Convergence and Trade-Offs in Riemannian Gradient Descent and Riemannian Proximal Point · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
gradient descent convergence |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Convergence and Trade-Offs in Riemannian Gradient Descent and Riemannian Proximal Point · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
proximal methods |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Convergence and Trade-Offs in Riemannian Gradient Descent and Riemannian Proximal Point · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
riemannian optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Convergence and Trade-Offs in Riemannian Gradient Descent and Riemannian Proximal Point · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
linear bandits |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Linear Bandits on Uniformly Convex Sets · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Linear Bandits on Uniformly Convex Sets · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Linear Bandits on Uniformly Convex Sets · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Computational geometry
convex geometry |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Linear Bandits on Uniformly Convex Sets · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
upper confidence bound · 1.0riemannian optimization · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9implicit update · 0.9hadamard manifolds · 0.9riemannian proximal point · 0.8riemannian gradient descent · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Accelerated Methods for Riemannian Min-Max Optimization Ensuring Bounded Geometric PenaltiesabstractIn this work, we study optimization problems of the form $\min_x \max_y f(x, y)$, where $f(x, y)$ is defined on a product Riemannian manifold $\mathcal{M} \times \mathcal{N}$ and is $\mu_x$-strongly geodesically convex (g-convex) in $x$ and $\mu_y$-strongly g-concave in $y$, for $\mu_x, \mu_y \geq 0$. We design accelerated methods when $f$ is $(L_x, L_y, L_{xy})$-smooth and $\mathcal{M}$, $\mathcal{N}$ are Hadamard. To that aim we introduce new g-convex optimization results, of independent interest: we show global linear convergence for metric-projected Riemannian gradient descent and improve existing accelerated methods by reducing geometric constants. Additionally, we complete the analysis of two previous works applying to the Riemannian min-max case by removing an assumption about iterates staying in a pre-specified compact set. David Martínez-Rubio, Christophe Roux, Chris Criscitiello, Sebastian Pokutta |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2025 | On the Byzantine-Resilience of Distillation-Based Federated LearningabstractFederated Learning (FL) algorithms using Knowledge Distillation (KD) have received increasing attention due to their favorable properties with respect to privacy, non-i.i.d. data and communication cost. These methods depart from transmitting model parameters and instead communicate information about a learning task by sharing predictions on a public dataset. In this work, we study the performance of such approaches in the byzantine setting, where a subset of the clients act in an adversarial manner aiming to disrupt the learning process. We show that KD-based FL algorithms are remarkably resilient and analyze how byzantine clients can influence the learning process. Based on these insights, we introduce two new byzantine attacks and demonstrate their ability to break existing byzantine-resilient methods. Additionally, we propose a novel defence method which enhances the byzantine resilience of KD-based FL algorithms. Finally, we provide a general framework to obfuscate attacks, making them significantly harder to detect, thereby improving their effectiveness. Christophe Roux, Max Zimmer, Sebastian Pokutta |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Implicit Riemannian Optimism with Applications to Min-Max ProblemsabstractWe introduce a Riemannian optimistic online learning algorithm for Hadamard manifolds based on inexact implicit updates. Unlike prior work, our method can handle in-manifold constraints, and matches the best known regret bounds in the Euclidean setting with no dependence on geometric constants, like the minimum curvature. Building on this, we develop algorithms for g-convex, g-concave smooth min-max problems on Hadamard manifolds. Notably, one method nearly matches the gradient oracle complexity of the lower bound for Euclidean problems, for the first time. Christophe Roux, David Martínez-Rubio, Sebastian Pokutta |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Convergence and Trade-Offs in Riemannian Gradient Descent and Riemannian Proximal PointabstractIn this work, we analyze two of the most fundamental algorithms in geodesically convex optimization: Riemannian gradient descent and (possibly inexact) Riemannian proximal point. We quantify their rates of convergence and produce different variants with several trade-offs. Crucially, we show the iterates naturally stay in a ball around an optimizer, of radius depending on the initial distance and, in some cases, on the curvature. Previous works simply assumed bounded iterates, resulting in rates that were not fully quantified. We also provide an implementable inexact proximal point algorithm and prove several new useful properties of Riemannian proximal methods: they work when positive curvature is present, the proximal operator does not move points away from any optimizer, and we quantify the smoothness of its induced Moreau envelope. Further, we explore beyond our theory with empirical tests. David Martínez-Rubio, Christophe Roux, Sebastian Pokutta |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Linear Bandits on Uniformly Convex SetsabstractLinear bandit algorithms yield $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n\sqrt{T})$ pseudo-regret bounds on compact convex action sets $\mathcal{K}\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ and two types of structural assumptions lead to better pseudo-regret bounds. When $\mathcal{K}$ is the simplex or an $\ell_p$ ball with $p\in]1,2]$, there exist bandits algorithms with $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{nT})$ pseudo-regret bounds. Here, we derive bandit algorithms for some strongly convex sets beyond $\ell_p$ balls that enjoy pseudo-regret bounds of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{nT})$. This result provides new elements for the open question in Bubeck and Cesa-Bianchi, 2012. When the action set is $q$-uniformly convex but not necessarily strongly convex ($q >2$), we obtain pseudo-regret bounds $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{1/q}T^{1/p})$ with $p$ s.t. $1/p + 1/q=1$. These pseudo-regret bounds are competitive with the general $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n\sqrt{T})$ for a time horizon range that depends on the degree $q>2$ of the set's uniform convexity and the dimension $n$ of the problem. Thomas Kerdreux, Christophe Roux, Alexandre d'Aspremont, Sebastian Pokutta |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |