Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lyujin Xu

dblp:380/0270 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph learning benchmark
0.912025
IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › efficient graph learning › data-efficient graph learning
imbalanced graph learning
0.912025
IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph classification
0.312025
IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
0.312025
IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data splitting · 0.9benchmarking · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 IMMix: Class-Imbalanced node classification via prototypical selective mixup augmentation
Jiawen Qin, Qingyun Sun, Lyujin Xu, Cheng Ji 0001, Jianxin Li 0002
Pattern Recognit.3
2025 IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning
abstract
Deep graph learning has gained grand popularity over the past years due to its versatility and success in representing graph data across a wide range of domains. However, the pervasive issue of imbalanced graph data distributions, where certain parts exhibit disproportionally abundant data while others remain sparse, undermines the efficacy of conventional graph learning algorithms, leading to biased outcomes. To address this challenge, Imbalanced Graph Learning (IGL) has garnered substantial attention, enabling more balanced data distributions and better task performance. Despite the proliferation of IGL algorithms, the absence of consistent experimental protocols and fair performance comparisons pose a significant barrier to comprehending advancements in this field. To bridge this gap, we introduce **IGL-Bench**, a foundational comprehensive benchmark for imbalanced graph learning, embarking on **17** diverse graph datasets and **24** distinct IGL algorithms with uniform data processing and splitting strategies. Specifically, IGL-Bench systematically investigates state-of-the-art IGL algorithms in terms of **effectiveness**, **robustness**, and **efficiency** on node-level and graph-level tasks, with the scope of class-imbalance and topology-imbalance. Extensive experiments demonstrate the potential benefits of IGL algorithms on various imbalanced conditions, offering insights and opportunities in the IGL field. Further, we have developed an open-sourced and unified package to facilitate reproducible evaluation and inspire further innovative research, available at: https://github.com/RingBDStack/IGL-Bench.
Jiawen Qin, Haonan Yuan, Qingyun Sun, Lyujin Xu, Pengfeng Huang, Zhaonan Wang 0005, Xingcheng Fu, Hao Peng 0001, Jianxin Li 0002, Philip S. Yu
ICLR4