Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lyujin Xu
dblp:380/0270
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph learning benchmark |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › efficient graph learning › data-efficient graph learning
imbalanced graph learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
data splitting · 0.9benchmarking · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | IMMix: Class-Imbalanced node classification via prototypical selective mixup augmentation
Jiawen Qin, Qingyun Sun, Lyujin Xu, Cheng Ji 0001, Jianxin Li 0002 |
Pattern Recognit. | 3 |
| 2025 | IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph LearningabstractDeep graph learning has gained grand popularity over the past years due to its versatility and success in representing graph data across a wide range of domains. However, the pervasive issue of imbalanced graph data distributions, where certain parts exhibit disproportionally abundant data while others remain sparse, undermines the efficacy of conventional graph learning algorithms, leading to biased outcomes. To address this challenge, Imbalanced Graph Learning (IGL) has garnered substantial attention, enabling more balanced data distributions and better task performance. Despite the proliferation of IGL algorithms, the absence of consistent experimental protocols and fair performance comparisons pose a significant barrier to comprehending advancements in this field. To bridge this gap, we introduce **IGL-Bench**, a foundational comprehensive benchmark for imbalanced graph learning, embarking on **17** diverse graph datasets and **24** distinct IGL algorithms with uniform data processing and splitting strategies. Specifically, IGL-Bench systematically investigates state-of-the-art IGL algorithms in terms of **effectiveness**, **robustness**, and **efficiency** on node-level and graph-level tasks, with the scope of class-imbalance and topology-imbalance. Extensive experiments demonstrate the potential benefits of IGL algorithms on various imbalanced conditions, offering insights and opportunities in the IGL field. Further, we have developed an open-sourced and unified package to facilitate reproducible evaluation and inspire further innovative research, available at: https://github.com/RingBDStack/IGL-Bench. Jiawen Qin, Haonan Yuan, Qingyun Sun, Lyujin Xu, Pengfeng Huang, Zhaonan Wang 0005, Xingcheng Fu, Hao Peng 0001, Jianxin Li 0002, Philip S. Yu |
ICLR | 4 |