The exponential growth of scientific literature has created a pressing need for automated survey generation. Although recent LLM-based agents have shown promise in automating this task, current progress is hindered by the lack of a standardized, scalable evaluation protocol. Existing evaluation methods typically rely on either human evaluation or custom metrics designed to validate specific pipelines, which restricts scalability and hinders fair comparison. To address this, we introduce SurGE, a benchmark and evaluation framework tailored for scientific survey generation. SurGE provides a large-scale retrieval corpus of over one million papers and expert-validated ground-truth surveys. Furthermore, we propose a robust multi-dimensional evaluation protocol that integrates both objective metrics and LLM-based judgments, and empirically verify its high alignment with human experts. Our experiments reveal that while agentic pipelines outperform RAG baselines in fluency and structural quality, they still struggle with citation accuracy, highlighting key directions for future research.

Legal case retrieval aims to help legal workers find relevant cases related to their cases at hand, which is important for the guarantee of fairness and justice in legal judgments. While recent advances in neural retrieval methods have significantly improved the performance of open-domain retrieval tasks (e.g., Web search), their advantages haven’t been observed in legal case retrieval due to their thirst for annotated data. As annotating large-scale training data in legal domains is prohibitive due to the need for domain expertise, traditional search techniques based on lexical matching such as TF-IDF, BM25, and Query Likelihood are still prevalent in legal case retrieval systems. While previous studies have designed several pre-training methods for IR models in open-domain tasks, these methods are usually suboptimal in legal case retrieval because they cannot understand and capture the key knowledge and data structures in the legal corpus. To this end, we propose a novel pre-training framework named Caseformer that enables the pre-trained models to learn legal knowledge and domain-specific relevance-matching patterns in legal case retrieval without any human-labeled data. This framework is designed to support both dense retrieval models and neural re-ranking models. Through three unsupervised learning tasks, Caseformer is able to capture the special language, document structure, and relevance-matching patterns of legal case documents, making it a strong backbone for downstream legal case retrieval tasks. Experimental results show that our model has achieved state-of-the-art performance in both zero-shot and fine-tuning settings. Also, experiments on both Chinese and English legal datasets demonstrate that the effectiveness of Caseformer is language-independent in legal case retrieval.