Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Junjie Meng

dblp:380/6565 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 38% 3D vision · 24% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 24%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal learning
1.012026
MCLMR: A Model-Agnostic Causal Learning Framework for Multi-Behavior Recommendation · WWW 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
MCLMR: A Model-Agnostic Causal Learning Framework for Multi-Behavior Recommendation · WWW 2026
Recommender systems › implicit feedback learning
multi-behavior recommendation
1.012026
MCLMR: A Model-Agnostic Causal Learning Framework for Multi-Behavior Recommendation · WWW 2026
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection
0.912025
MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection › point cloud object detection
LiDAR-based 3D object detection
0.912025
MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › test-time adaptation
online test-time adaptation
0.912025
MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift
0.912025
MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation
0.912025
MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-agnostic framework · 2.0causal inference · 2.0model ensemble · 0.9feature similarity · 0.9checkpoint averaging · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 SAT-Based Synthesis of Minimal Deterministic Real-Time Automata via 3DRTA Representation
Junjie Meng, Jie An 0001, Yong Li 0031, Andrea Turrini, Miaomiao Zhang 0003
VMCAI1
2026 MCLMR: A Model-Agnostic Causal Learning Framework for Multi-Behavior Recommendation
Ranxu Zhang, Junjie Meng, Ying Sun 0006, Ziqi Xu 0001, Yanyong Zhang, Chao Wang 0086
WWW2
2025 MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection
abstract
LiDAR-based 3D object detection is crucial for various applications but often experiences performance degradation in real-world deployments due to domain shifts. While most studies focus on cross-dataset shifts, such as changes in environments and object geometries, practical corruptions from sensor variations and weather conditions remain underexplored. In this work, we propose a novel online test-time adaptation framework for 3D detectors that effectively tackles these shifts, including a challenging $\textit{cross-corruption}$ scenario where cross-dataset shifts and corruptions co-occur. By leveraging long-term knowledge from previous test batches, our approach mitigates catastrophic forgetting and adapts effectively to diverse shifts. Specifically, we propose a Model Synergy (MOS) strategy that dynamically selects historical checkpoints with diverse knowledge and assembles them to best accommodate the current test batch. This assembly is directed by our proposed Synergy Weights (SW), which perform a weighted averaging of the selected checkpoints, minimizing redundancy in the composite model. The SWs are computed by evaluating the similarity of predicted bounding boxes on the test data and the independence of features between checkpoint pairs in the model bank. To maintain an efficient and informative model bank, we discard checkpoints with the lowest average SW scores, replacing them with newly updated models. Our method was rigorously tested against existing test-time adaptation strategies across three datasets and eight types of corruptions, demonstrating superior adaptability to dynamic scenes and conditions. Notably, it achieved a 67.3% improvement in a challenging cross-corruption scenario, offering a more comprehensive benchmark for adaptation. Source code: https://github.com/zhuoxiao-chen/MOS.
Zhuoxiao Chen, Junjie Meng, Mahsa Baktash, Yonggang Zhang 0003, Zi Huang, Yadan Luo
ICLR2
2025 Efficient Decomposition Identification of Deterministic Finite Automata from Examples
Junjie Meng, Jie An 0001, Yong Li 0031, Andrea Turrini, Fanjiang Xu, Naijun Zhan, Miaomiao Zhang 0003
SETTA1