Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Christabel Acquaye

dblp:380/7704 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 46% Language models and text generation · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.812024
Susu Box or Piggy Bank: Assessing Cultural Commonsense Knowledge between Ghana and the US · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias in language models
cultural bias in language models
0.812024
Susu Box or Piggy Bank: Assessing Cultural Commonsense Knowledge between Ghana and the US · EMNLP 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
cultural commonsense
0.812024
Susu Box or Piggy Bank: Assessing Cultural Commonsense Knowledge between Ghana and the US · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.812024
Susu Box or Piggy Bank: Assessing Cultural Commonsense Knowledge between Ghana and the US · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.212024
Susu Box or Piggy Bank: Assessing Cultural Commonsense Knowledge between Ghana and the US · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey validation · 0.8multiple-choice question construction · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 All-in-One Conditioning for Text-to-Image Synthesis
Hirunima Jayasekara, Chuong Huynh, Yixuan Ren, Christabel Acquaye, Abhinav Shrivastava
ICPR (2)4
2025 My LLM might Mimic AAE - But When Should It?
abstract
Sandra Camille Sandoval, Christabel Acquaye, Kwesi Adu Cobbina, Mohammad Nayeem Teli, Hal Daumé Iii. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Sandra Sandoval, Christabel Acquaye, Kwesi A. Cobbina, Mohammad Nayeem Teli, Hal Daumé III
NAACL (Long Papers)2
2024 Susu Box or Piggy Bank: Assessing Cultural Commonsense Knowledge between Ghana and the US
abstract
Recent work has highlighted the culturallycontingent nature of commonsense knowledge (Shen et al., 2024).We introduce AMAMMERE (/A:.mA:.mu:.reI/),from the Akan word meaning 'culture.'This test set of 525 multiple-choice questions is designed to evaluate the commonsense knowledge of English LLMs, relative to the cultural contexts of Ghana and the United States.To create AMAMMERE, we select a set of multiplechoice questions (MCQs) from existing commonsense datasets and rewrite them in a multistage process involving surveys of Ghanaian and U.S. participants.In three rounds of surveys, participants from both pools are solicited to ( 1) write correct and incorrect answer choices, ( 2) rate individual answer choices on a 5-point Likert scale, and (3) select the best answer choice from the newly-constructed MCQ items, in a final validation step.By engaging participants at multiple stages, our procedure ensures that participant perspectives are incorporated both in the creation and validation of test items, resulting in high levels of agreement within each pool.We evaluate several off-the-shelf English LLMs on AMAMMERE. 1 Uniformly, models prefer answers choices that align with the preferences of U.S. annotators over Ghanaian annotators.Additionally, when test items specify a cultural context (Ghana or the U.S.), models exhibit some ability to adapt, but performance is consistently better in U.S. contexts than Ghanaian.As large resources are devoted to the advancement of English LLMs, our findings underscore the need for culturally adaptable models and evaluations to meet the needs of diverse English-speaking populations around the world.
Christabel Acquaye, Haozhe An, Rachel Rudinger
EMNLP1