Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xuekang Zhu
dblp:380/7889
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 43% Representation and self-supervised learning · 43% Vision and language · 15% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics › multimedia forensics › image forensics
image manipulation localization |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Mesoscopic Insights: Orchestrating Multi-Scale & Hybrid Architecture for Image Manipulation Localization · AAAI 2025 Can We Get Rid of Handcrafted Feature Extractors? SparseViT: Nonsemantics-Centered, Parameter-Efficient Image Manipulation Localization Through Spare-Coding Transformer · AAAI 2025 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics › multimedia forensics
image forensics |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TextShield-R1: Reinforced Reasoning for Tampered Text Detection · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
multi-scale representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mesoscopic Insights: Orchestrating Multi-Scale & Hybrid Architecture for Image Manipulation Localization · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can We Get Rid of Handcrafted Feature Extractors? SparseViT: Nonsemantics-Centered, Parameter-Efficient Image Manipulation Localization Through Spare-Coding Transformer · AAAI 2025 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
deepfake detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ForensicHub: A Unified Benchmark & Codebase for All-Domain Fake Image Detection and Localization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › forgery detection
image forgery detection and localization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ForensicHub: A Unified Benchmark & Codebase for All-Domain Fake Image Detection and Localization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | IMDL-BenCo: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Codebase for Image Manipulation Detection & Localization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | TextShield-R1: Reinforced Reasoning for Tampered Text Detection · AAAI 2026 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics › multimedia forensics › image forensics
AI-generated image detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ForensicHub: A Unified Benchmark & Codebase for All-Domain Fake Image Detection and Localization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 2.0group relative policy optimization · 2.0OCR rectification · 2.0transformer · 1.7sparse self-attention · 1.7convolutional neural network · 1.7robustness evaluation · 1.5modular architecture · 0.9fusion protocol evaluation · 0.9adapter-based design · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | TextShield-R1: Reinforced Reasoning for Tampered Text DetectionabstractThe growing prevalence of tampered images poses serious security threats, highlighting the urgent need for reliable detection methods. Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) demonstrate strong potential in analyzing tampered images and generating interpretations. However, they still struggle with identifying micro-level artifacts, exhibit low accuracy in localizing tampered text regions, and heavily rely on expensive annotations for forgery interpretation. To this end, we introduce TextShield-R1, the first reinforcement learning based MLLM solution for tampered text detection and reasoning. Specifically, our approach introduces Forensic Continual pre-training, an easy-to-hard curriculum that well prepares the MLLM for tampered text detection by harnessing the large-scale cheap data from natural image forensic and OCR tasks. During fine-tuning, we perform Group Relative Policy Optimization with novel reward functions to reduce annotation dependency and improve reasoning capabilities. At inference time, we enhance localization accuracy via OCR Rectification, a method that leverages the MLLM’s strong text recognition abilities to refine its predictions. Furthermore, to support rigorous evaluation, we introduce Text Forensics Reasoning (TFR) benchmark, comprising over 45k real and tampered images across 16 languages, 10 tampering techniques, and diverse domains. Rich reasoning-style annotations are included, allowing for comprehensive assessment. Our TFR benchmark simultaneously addresses seven major limitations of existing benchmarks and enables robust evaluation under cross-style, cross-method, and cross-language conditions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TextShield-R1 significantly advances the state of the art in interpretable tampered text detection. Chenfan Qu, Yiwu Zhong, Xuekang Zhu, Bohan Yu |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2025 | Can We Get Rid of Handcrafted Feature Extractors? SparseViT: Nonsemantics-Centered, Parameter-Efficient Image Manipulation Localization Through Spare-Coding TransformerabstractNon-semantic features or semantic-agnostic features, which are irrelevant to image context but sensitive to image manipulations, are recognized as evidential to Image Manipulation Localization (IML). Since manual labels are impossible, existing works rely on handcrafted methods to extract non-semantic features. Handcrafted non-semantic features jeopardize IML model's generalization ability in unseen or complex scenarios. Therefore, for IML, the elephant in the room is: How to adaptively extract non-semantic features? Non-semantic features are context-irrelevant and manipulation-sensitive. That is, within an image, they are consistent across patches unless manipulation occurs. Then, spare and discrete interactions among image patches are sufficient for extracting non-semantic features. However, image semantics vary drastically on different patches, requiring dense and continuous interactions among image patches for learning semantic representations. Hence, in this paper, we propose a Sparse Vision Transformer (SparseViT), which reformulates the dense, global self-attention in ViT into a sparse, discrete manner. Such sparse self-attention breaks image semantics and forces SparseViT to adaptively extract non-semantic features for images. Besides, compared with existing IML models, the sparse self-attention mechanism largely reduced the model size (max 80% in FLOPs), achieving stunning parameter efficiency and computation reduction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, without any handcrafted feature extractors, SparseViT is superior in both generalization and efficiency across benchmark datasets. Xiaochen Ma 0001, Xuekang Zhu, Chaoqun Niu, Zeyu Lei, Jizhe Zhou 0001 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | Mesoscopic Insights: Orchestrating Multi-Scale & Hybrid Architecture for Image Manipulation LocalizationabstractThe mesoscopic level serves as a bridge between the macroscopic and microscopic worlds, addressing gaps overlooked by both. Image manipulation localization (IML), a crucial technique to pursue truth from fake images, has long relied on low-level (microscopic-level) traces. However, in practice, most tampering aims to deceive the audience by altering image semantics. As a result, manipulation commonly occurs at the object level (macroscopic level), which is equally important as microscopic traces. Therefore, integrating these two levels into the mesoscopic level presents a new perspective for IML research. Inspired by this, our paper explores how to simultaneously construct mesoscopic representations of micro and macro information for IML and introduces the Mesorch architecture to orchestrate both. Specifically, this architecture i) combines Transformers and CNNs in parallel, with Transformers extracting macro information and CNNs capturing micro details, and ii) explores across different scales, assessing micro and macro information seamlessly. Additionally, based on the Mesorch architecture, the paper introduces two baseline models aimed at solving IML tasks through mesoscopic representation. Extensive experiments across four datasets have demonstrated that our models surpass the current state-of-the-art in terms of performance, computational complexity, and robustness. Xuekang Zhu, Xiaochen Ma 0001, Zhuohang Jiang, Xiwen Wang 0002, Zeyu Lei, Wentao Feng, Chi-Man Pun, Jizhe Zhou 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | M3: Manipulation Mask Manufacturer for Arbitrary-Scale Super-Resolution Mask
Xiaochen Ma 0001, Xuekang Zhu, Bingkui Tong, Zeyu Lei, Jizhe Zhou 0001 |
CVM (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | Saliency Guided Optimization of Diffusion Latents
Xiwen Wang 0002, Jizhe Zhou 0001, Xuekang Zhu, Mao Li 0001 |
MMM (3) | 3 |
| 2025 | ForensicHub: A Unified Benchmark & Codebase for All-Domain Fake Image Detection and LocalizationabstractThe field of Fake Image Detection and Localization (FIDL) is highly fragmented, encompassing four domains: deepfake detection (Deepfake), image manipulation detection and localization (IMDL), artificial intelligence-generated image detection (AIGC), and document image manipulation localization (Doc). Although individual benchmarks exist in some domains, a unified benchmark for all domains in FIDL remains blank. The absence of a unified benchmark results in significant domain silos, where each domain independently constructs its datasets, models, and evaluation protocols without interoperability, preventing cross-domain comparisons and hindering the development of the entire FIDL field. To close the domain silo barrier, we propose ForensicHub, the first unified benchmark & codebase for all-domain fake image detection and localization. Considering drastic variations on dataset, model, and evaluation configurations across all domains, as well as the scarcity of open-sourced baseline models and the lack of individual benchmarks in some domains, ForensicHub: i) proposes a modular and configuration-driven architecture that decomposes forensic pipelines into interchangeable components across datasets, transforms, models, and evaluators, allowing flexible composition across all domains; ii) fully implements 10 baseline models (3 of which are reproduced from scratch), 6 backbones, 2 new benchmarks for AIGC and Doc, and integrates 2 existing benchmarks of DeepfakeBench and IMDLBenCo through an adapter-based design; iii) establishes an image forensic fusion protocol evaluation mechanism that supports unified training and testing of diverse forensic models across tasks; iv) conducts indepth analysis based on the ForensicHub, offering 8 key actionable insights into FIDL model architecture, dataset characteristics, and evaluation standards. Specifically, ForensicHub includes 4 forensic tasks, 23 datasets, 42 baseline models, 6 backbones, 11 GPU-accelerated pixel- and image-level evaluation metrics, and realizes 16 kinds of cross-domain evaluations. ForensicHub represents a significant leap forward in breaking the domain silos in the FIDL field and inspiring future breakthroughs. Code is available at: https://github.com/scu-zjz/ForensicHub. Xuekang Zhu, Xiaochen Ma 0001, Chenfan Qu, Kaiwen Feng, Chi-Man Pun, Jizhe Zhou 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | IMDL-BenCo: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Codebase for Image Manipulation Detection & LocalizationabstractA comprehensive benchmark is yet to be established in the Image Manipulation Detection & Localization (IMDL) field. The absence of such a benchmark leads to insufficient and misleading model evaluations, severely undermining the development of this field. However, the scarcity of open-sourced baseline models and inconsistent training and evaluation protocols make conducting rigorous experiments and faithful comparisons among IMDL models challenging. To address these challenges, we introduce IMDL-BenCo, the first comprehensive IMDL benchmark and modular codebase. IMDL-BenCo: i) decomposes the IMDL framework into standardized, reusable components and revises the model construction pipeline, improving coding efficiency and customization flexibility; ii) fully implements or incorporates training code for state-of-the-art models to establish a comprehensive IMDL benchmark; and iii) conducts deep analysis based on the established benchmark and codebase, offering new insights into IMDL model architecture, dataset characteristics, and evaluation standards.Specifically, IMDL-BenCo includes common processing algorithms, 8 state-of-the-art IMDL models (1 of which are reproduced from scratch), 2 sets of standard training and evaluation protocols, 15 GPU-accelerated evaluation metrics, and 3 kinds of robustness evaluation. This benchmark and codebase represent a significant leap forward in calibrating the current progress in the IMDL field and inspiring future breakthroughs.Code is available at: https://github.com/scu-zjz/IMDLBenCo Xiaochen Ma 0001, Xuekang Zhu, Zhuohang Jiang, Bingkui Tong, Zeyu Lei, Chi-Man Pun, Jiancheng Lv 0001, Jizhe Zhou 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |