Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samuel Howard
dblp:381/4346
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 33% Learning theory · 17% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
manifold hypothesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
schrödinger bridge |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Tree-Structured Costs and Entropic Wasserstein Barycentres · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
wasserstein barycenter |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Tree-Structured Costs and Entropic Wasserstein Barycentres · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score matching · 0.9optimal transport · 0.9log-domain smoothing · 0.9iterative proportional fitting · 0.9iterative markovian fitting · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry AdaptiveabstractDiffusion models have achieved state-of-the-art performance, demonstrating remarkable generalisation capabilities across diverse domains. However, the mechanisms underpinning these strong capabilities remain only partially understood. A leading conjecture, based on the manifold hypothesis, attributes this success to their ability to adapt to low-dimensional geometric structure within the data. This work provides evidence for this conjecture, focusing on how such phenomena could result from the formulation of the learning problem through score matching. We inspect the role of implicit regularisation by investigating the effect of smoothing minimisers of the empirical score matching objective. Our theoretical and empirical results confirm that smoothing the score function—or equivalently, smoothing in the log-density domain—produces smoothing tangential to the data manifold. In addition, we show that the manifold along which the diffusion model generalises can be controlled by choosing an appropriate smoothing. Tyler Farghly, Peter Potaptchik, Samuel Howard, George Deligiannidis, Jakiw Pidstrigach |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2025 | Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Tree-Structured Costs and Entropic Wasserstein BarycentresabstractRecent advances in flow-based generative modelling have provided scalable methods for computing the Schrödinger Bridge (SB) between distributions, a dynamic form of entropy-regularised Optimal Transport (OT) for the quadratic cost. The successful Iterative Markovian Fitting (IMF) procedure solves the SB problem via sequential bridge-matching steps, presenting an elegant and practical approach with many favourable properties over the more traditional Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF) procedure. Beyond the standard setting, optimal transport can be generalised to the multi-marginal case in which the objective is to minimise a cost defined over several marginal distributions. Of particular importance are costs defined over a tree structure, from which Wasserstein barycentres can be recovered as a special case. In this work, we extend the IMF procedure to solve for the tree-structured SB problem. Our resulting algorithm inherits the many advantages of IMF over IPF approaches in the tree-based setting. In the case of Wasserstein barycentres, our approach can be viewed as extending the widely used fixed-point approach to use flow-based entropic OT solvers, while requiring only simple bridge-matching steps at each iteration. Samuel Howard, Peter Potaptchik, George Deligiannidis |
NeurIPS | 1 |