Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam David

dblp:381/4491 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.812024
Mirror and Preconditioned Gradient Descent in Wasserstein Space · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
preconditioned gradient descent
0.812024
Mirror and Preconditioned Gradient Descent in Wasserstein Space · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wasserstein gradient flow · 0.8preconditioned gradient descent · 0.8mirror descent · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Mirror and Preconditioned Gradient Descent in Wasserstein Space
abstract
As the problem of minimizing functionals on the Wasserstein space encompasses many applications in machine learning, different optimization algorithms on $\mathbb{R}^d$ have received their counterpart analog on the Wasserstein space. We focus here on lifting two explicit algorithms: mirror descent and preconditioned gradient descent. These algorithms have been introduced to better capture the geometry of the function to minimize and are provably convergent under appropriate (namely relative) smoothness and convexity conditions. Adapting these notions to the Wasserstein space, we prove guarantees of convergence of some Wasserstein-gradient-based discrete-time schemes for new pairings of objective functionals and regularizers. The difficulty here is to carefully select along which curves the functionals should be smooth and convex. We illustrate the advantages of adapting the geometry induced by the regularizer on ill conditioned optimization tasks, and showcase the improvement of choosing different discrepancies and geometries in a computational biology task of aligning single-cells.
Clément Bonet, Théo Uscidda, Adam David, Pierre-Cyril Aubin-Frankowski, Anna Korba
NeurIPS3