Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shige Liu

dblp:381/6170 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-7179-1735ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Indexing and storage engines · 56% Database system architecture and tuning · 28% Information retrieval · 17%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Indexing and storage engines › vector index
approximate nearest neighbor index
0.812024
Are There Fundamental Limitations in Supporting Vector Data Management in Relational Databases? A Case Study of PostgreSQL · ICDE 2024
Indexing and storage engines
vector index
0.812024
Are There Fundamental Limitations in Supporting Vector Data Management in Relational Databases? A Case Study of PostgreSQL · ICDE 2024
Information retrieval › similarity search
high-dimensional similarity search
0.212024
Are There Fundamental Limitations in Supporting Vector Data Management in Relational Databases? A Case Study of PostgreSQL · ICDE 2024
Information retrieval
similarity search
0.212024
Are There Fundamental Limitations in Supporting Vector Data Management in Relational Databases? A Case Study of PostgreSQL · ICDE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

source code analysis · 0.8performance profiling · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Fast Vector Search in PostgreSQL: A Decoupled Approach
Chenzhe Jin, Shige Liu, Jianguo Wang 0001
CIDR5
2024 Are There Fundamental Limitations in Supporting Vector Data Management in Relational Databases? A Case Study of PostgreSQL
abstract
High-dimensional vector data is gaining increasing importance in data science applications. Consequently, various database systems have recently been developed to manage vector data. These systems can be broadly categorized into two types: specialized and generalized vector databases. Specialized vector databases are explicitly designed and optimized for storing and querying vector data, while generalized vector databases support vector data management within a relational database like PostgreSQL. It is expected (and confirmed by our experiments) that generalized vector databases exhibit slower performance. However, it is not clear whether there are fundamental limitations (or just implementation issues) for relational databases to support vector data management. This paper aims to answer this question. We chose PostgreSQL as a representative relational database due to its popularity. We focused on PASE, as it is a high-performance and open-sourced PostgreSQL-based vector database. We analyzed the source code of PASE and compared its performance with Faiss, a high-performance and open-sourced specialized vector database, to identify the underlying root causes of the performance gap and analyze how to bridge the gap. Based on our results, we provide insights and directions for building a future generalized vector database that can achieve comparable performance to a high-performance specialized vector database.
Shige Liu, Jianguo Wang 0001
ICDE2