Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shige Liu
dblp:381/6170
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-7179-1735ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Indexing and storage engines · 56% Database system architecture and tuning · 28% Information retrieval · 17% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Indexing and storage engines › vector index
approximate nearest neighbor index |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Are There Fundamental Limitations in Supporting Vector Data Management in Relational Databases? A Case Study of PostgreSQL · ICDE 2024 |
Indexing and storage engines
vector index |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Are There Fundamental Limitations in Supporting Vector Data Management in Relational Databases? A Case Study of PostgreSQL · ICDE 2024 |
Information retrieval › similarity search
high-dimensional similarity search |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Are There Fundamental Limitations in Supporting Vector Data Management in Relational Databases? A Case Study of PostgreSQL · ICDE 2024 |
Information retrieval
similarity search |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Are There Fundamental Limitations in Supporting Vector Data Management in Relational Databases? A Case Study of PostgreSQL · ICDE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
source code analysis · 0.8performance profiling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Fast Vector Search in PostgreSQL: A Decoupled Approach
Chenzhe Jin, Shige Liu, Jianguo Wang 0001 |
CIDR | 5 |
| 2024 | Are There Fundamental Limitations in Supporting Vector Data Management in Relational Databases? A Case Study of PostgreSQLabstractHigh-dimensional vector data is gaining increasing importance in data science applications. Consequently, various database systems have recently been developed to manage vector data. These systems can be broadly categorized into two types: specialized and generalized vector databases. Specialized vector databases are explicitly designed and optimized for storing and querying vector data, while generalized vector databases support vector data management within a relational database like PostgreSQL. It is expected (and confirmed by our experiments) that generalized vector databases exhibit slower performance. However, it is not clear whether there are fundamental limitations (or just implementation issues) for relational databases to support vector data management. This paper aims to answer this question. We chose PostgreSQL as a representative relational database due to its popularity. We focused on PASE, as it is a high-performance and open-sourced PostgreSQL-based vector database. We analyzed the source code of PASE and compared its performance with Faiss, a high-performance and open-sourced specialized vector database, to identify the underlying root causes of the performance gap and analyze how to bridge the gap. Based on our results, we provide insights and directions for building a future generalized vector database that can achieve comparable performance to a high-performance specialized vector database. Shige Liu, Jianguo Wang 0001 |
ICDE | 2 |